IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0311730.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trends in the levels, causes, and risk factors of maternal mortality in Pakistan: A comparative analysis of national surveys of 2007 and 2019

Author

Listed:
  • Farid Midhet
  • Samina Naeem Khalid
  • Shehla Baqai
  • Shahzad Ali Khan

Abstract

Background: Maternal mortality ratio (MMR) has decreased worldwide but Pakistan is still striving towards achieving the SDG targets for maternal health. This study highlights the trends in maternal mortality levels and risk factors in Pakistan between 2007 and 2019. Methods: This study compares the results of secondary data analysis of the Pakistan Maternal Mortality Survey 2019 with the Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey 2007. A nested case-control study was carved to compare maternal deaths with the women who survived a pregnancy, in the same sampling clusters during the same period. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) for major risk factors of maternal mortality after adjusting for the women’s age, parity, education, and wealth quintile. Results: In 2019, Pakistan’s MMR was 186 per 100,000 live births, registering a 33% decline from 2007 (rural 42% vs. urban 11%). The leading causes of maternal mortality were postpartum hemorrhage, hypertensive disease of pregnancy, postpartum infection, and post-abortion complications. Women > 35 years and those expecting their first child were more likely to die from childbirth, while those who had ever used family planning had a lower risk according to the data for both years. In 2007, a distance of > 40 kilometers to a hospital significantly increased the risk of mortality but this association was not significant in 2019. In 2019, women who died were more likely to receive antenatal care than those who survived (adjusted OR 9.3); this association was not significant in 2007. Conclusion: The modest reduction in MMR can be attributed to improved access to maternal health services in rural areas with increased antenatal care and institutional deliveries. However, most maternal deaths were caused by poor accessibility to quality emergency obstetric care. Lack of family planning remains a major risk factor for high maternal mortality in Pakistan.

Suggested Citation

  • Farid Midhet & Samina Naeem Khalid & Shehla Baqai & Shahzad Ali Khan, 2025. "Trends in the levels, causes, and risk factors of maternal mortality in Pakistan: A comparative analysis of national surveys of 2007 and 2019," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-14, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0311730
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311730
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0311730
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0311730&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0311730?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Noshaba Aziz & Jun He & Tanwne Sarker & Hongguang Sui, 2021. "Exploring the Role of Health Expenditure and Maternal Mortality in South Asian Countries: An Approach towards Shaping Better Health Policy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Farid Midhet & Mubashir Hanif & Samina Naeem Khalid & Raheel Shahab Khan & Ikhlaq Ahmad & Shahzad Ali Khan, 2023. "Factors associated with maternal health services utilization in Pakistan: Evidence from Pakistan maternal mortality survey, 2019," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(11), pages 1-11, November.
    3. Adnan Muhammad Shah & KangYoon Lee & Javaria Nisa Mir, 2021. "Exploring Readiness for Birth Control in Improving Women Health Status: Factors Influencing the Adoption of Modern Contraceptives Methods for Family Planning Practices," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-20, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Britni L. Ayers & Rachel S. Purvis & Jennifer Callaghan-Koru & Sharon Reece & Sheena CarlLee & Nirvana Manning & Krista Langston & Sheldon Riklon & Pearl A. McElfish, 2023. "Marshallese Mothers’ and Marshallese Maternal Healthcare Providers’ Perspectives on Contraceptive Use and Reproductive Life Planning Practices and Influences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Rihem Zeiri & Aida Bouzir & Mohamed H di Benhadj Mbarek & Saloua Benammou, 2023. "The Link between Economic Growth, Air Pollution and Health Expenditure in the G7 Countries," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(4), pages 156-168, July.
    3. Aziz, Noshaba & Raza, Ali & Sui, Hongguang & Zhang, Zhixin, 2024. "Empowering women for embracing energy-efficient appliances: Unraveling factors and driving change in Pakistan's residential sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PB).
    4. Olzhas Zhamantayev & Gaukhar Kayupova & Karina Nukeshtayeva & Nurbek Yerdessov & Zhanerke Bolatova & Anar Turmukhambetova, 2023. "COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on the Maternal Mortality in Kazakhstan and Comparison with the Countries in Central Asia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Enkai Guo & Huamei Zhong & Yang Gao & Jing Li & Zhaohong Wang, 2022. "Socioeconomic Disparities in Health Care Consumption: Using the 2018-China Family Panel Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-14, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0311730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.