Author
Listed:
- Darwin A León-Figueroa
- Edwin A Garcia-Vasquez
- Milagros Diaz-Torres
- Edwin Aguirre-Milachay
- Jean Pierre Villanueva-De La Cruz
- Hortencia M Saldaña-Cumpa
- Mario J Valladares-Garrido
Abstract
Background: Dengue is an acute febrile illness that is a significant public health problem. Peru is an endemic region for vector-borne diseases such as dengue, zika, and chikungunya, which initially manifest with febrile illness and can complicate differential diagnosis. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the prevalence of positive results for dengue or dengue antibodies in Peruvian patients with febrile illness using diagnostic tools such as RT-PCR and ELISA NS1, IgM, and IgG. Methods: A literature search was conducted in eight databases or search tools (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, Virtual Health Library, and Scielo) until June 9, 2024. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms such as “dengue” and “Peru” were used, together with the free term “febrile illness”, combined using the Boolean operators AND and OR. We included observational studies with a control group of patients with fever but no dengue infection and a non-control group of febrile patients who tested positive for dengue. Pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects models. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Statistical Meta-Analysis Assessment and Review Instrument. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic, and statistical analysis was performed with R version 4.2.3. Results: We included 15 observational studies that met the inclusion criteria developed in 10 regions of Peru and published between 2002 and 2022, with a total of 12,355 patients with febrile illness. The pooled prevalence of positive results for dengue or dengue antibodies in these patients was 21% (95% CI: 9%−36%; 2022 participants; 5 studies; I2 = 98%) for IgG ELISA, 16% (95% CI: 11%−21%; 10891 participants; 10 studies; I2 = 97%) for IgM ELISA, 19% (95% CI: 9%−31%; 2086 participants; 5 studies; I2 = 98%) for NS1 ELISA, and 20% (95% CI: 13%−28%; 3107 participants; 9 studies; I2 = 96%) for RNA PCR. Conclusion: Our results suggest a high prevalence of positive results for dengue or dengue antibodies among febrile patients in Peru, which varies depending on the diagnostic method used. Despite this variability, the use of accurate diagnostic methods is essential for the early detection and prevention of serious complications. The findings underline the need to strengthen dengue control strategies, improve diagnostic capacity in health centers, and optimize epidemiological surveillance in high-incidence regions. It is recommended that public health policies focus on these key areas for better management of the disease.
Suggested Citation
Darwin A León-Figueroa & Edwin A Garcia-Vasquez & Milagros Diaz-Torres & Edwin Aguirre-Milachay & Jean Pierre Villanueva-De La Cruz & Hortencia M Saldaña-Cumpa & Mario J Valladares-Garrido, 2025.
"Prevalence of dengue in febrile patients in Peru: A systematic review and meta-analysis,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-14, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0310163
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310163
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0310163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.