IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0308856.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The implementation of an integrated workplace health promotion program in Dutch organizations ‐ A mixed methods process evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Denise J M Smit
  • Sandra H van Oostrom
  • Josephine A Engels
  • Suzan Mooren-van der Meer
  • Karin I Proper

Abstract

Objective: To gain insight into 1) the degree of implementation of an integrated workplace health promotion program (WHPP) 2) the perceptions of employers and employees regarding an integrated WHPP and 3) the contextual factors that hindered or enhanced implementation. Methods: Data were collected by means of questionnaires, interviews among 19 employees, supervisors and HR-professionals, monitoring charts and observations at 6–10 months after the start of the implementation of the integrated WHPP. To evaluate the implementation process, ten process indicators from the evaluation frameworks of Nielsen & Randall and Wierenga were assessed. Descriptive analyses were performed for the process indicators as measured by questionnaires, monitoring charts and observations. Interviews with employers and employees were recorded, transcribed and then coded by two researchers independently by means of thematic coding. Results: The results cover the following topics: implemented activities, the working group, engagement of employees, the role of management and policy and organizational preconditions. Although the criteria of the WHPP were not completely met, various activities were implemented in all participating organizations. Working groups consisting of Human Resources professionals, supervisors and employees, who selected and implemented activities, were composed within each organization. 22% of the employees did not feel involved in the implementation process. The absence of organizational policies regarding WHP hampered implementation. Organizations had the intention to continue with the integrated WHPP, which requires sufficient time and budget. Conclusions: The implementation of the integrated WHPP appeared to be challenging and complex. Working groups indicated that they made the first important steps in integrating WHP in their organization and had the intention to continue with the implementation. However, to increase the impact, employers and employees should have the opportunity to implement and participate in WHP. Hence, organizational policies regarding WHP and active support of higher management are expected to be essential.

Suggested Citation

  • Denise J M Smit & Sandra H van Oostrom & Josephine A Engels & Suzan Mooren-van der Meer & Karin I Proper, 2024. "The implementation of an integrated workplace health promotion program in Dutch organizations ‐ A mixed methods process evaluation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0308856
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0308856
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0308856&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0308856?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah L Brand & Jo Thompson Coon & Lora E Fleming & Lauren Carroll & Alison Bethel & Katrina Wyatt, 2017. "Whole-system approaches to improving the health and wellbeing of healthcare workers: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-26, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rita de Cássia Akutsu & Ada Rocha & Victor Viana & Luiz Akutsu & Izabel Cristina Silva & Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho & Heesup Han & António Raposo & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Luis Araya-Castillo & Renat, 2021. "Well-Being at Work: A Cross-Sectional Study on the Portuguese Nutritionists," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-13, July.
    2. David Lucas & Sandrine Brient & Tanguy Le Grand & Jean-Dominique Dewitte & Brice Loddé & Richard Pougnet & Bisi Moriamo Eveillard, 2022. "Evolution of Global Health and Psychosocial Factors among Hospital Workers during First Year of SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: A Longitudinal Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-11, November.
    3. Anna Schneider & Matthias Weigl, 2018. "Associations between psychosocial work factors and provider mental well-being in emergency departments: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Rose Nabi Deborah Karimi Muthuri & Flavia Senkubuge & Charles Hongoro, 2020. "Determinants of happiness among healthcare professionals between 2009 and 2019: a systematic review," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Maria Luisa Scapellato & Vera Comiati & Alessandra Buja & Giulia Buttignol & Romina Valentini & Valentina Burati & Lucia La Serra & Isabella Maccà & Paola Mason & Pasquale Scopa & Anna Volpin & Andrea, 2018. "Combined Before-and-After Workplace Intervention to Promote Healthy Lifestyles in Healthcare Workers (STI-VI Study): Short-Term Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-14, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0308856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.