IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0307282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health disparities in cervical cancer: Estimating geographic variations of disease burden and association with key socioeconomic and demographic factors in the US

Author

Listed:
  • Tara Castellano
  • Andrew K ElHabr
  • Christina Washington
  • Jie Ting
  • Yitong J Zhang
  • Fernanda Musa
  • Ezgi Berksoy
  • Kathleen Moore
  • Leslie Randall
  • Jagpreet Chhatwal
  • Turgay Ayer
  • Charles A Leath III

Abstract

Background: Despite advances in cervical cancer (CC) prevention, detection, and treatment in the US, health disparities persist, disproportionately affecting underserved populations or regions. This study analyzes the geographical distribution of both CC and recurrent/metastatic CC (r/mCC) in the US and explores potential risk factors of higher disease burden to inform potential strategies to address disparities in CC and r/mCC. Methods: We estimated CC screening rates, as well as CC burden (number of patients with CC diagnosis per 100,000 eligible enrollees) and r/mCC burden (proportion of CC patients receiving systemic therapy not in conjunction with surgery or radiation), at the geographic level between 2017–2022 using administrative claims. Data on income and race/ethnicity were obtained from US Census Bureau’s American Community Survey. Brachytherapy centers were proxies for guideline-conforming care for locally advanced CC. Associations among demographic, socioeconomic, and healthcare resource variables, with CC and r/mCC disease burden were assessed. Results: Between 2017–2022, approximately 48,000 CC-diagnosed patients were identified, and approximately 10,000 initiated systemic therapy treatment. Both CC and r/mCC burden varied considerably across the US. Higher screening was significantly associated with lower CC burden only in the South. Lower income level was significantly associated with lower screening rates, higher CC and r/mCC burden. Higher proportion of Hispanic population was also associated with higher CC burden. The presence of ≥1 brachytherapy center in a region was significantly associated with a reduction in r/mCC burden (2.7%). Conclusion: CC and r/mCC disparities are an interplay of certain social determinants of health, behavior, and race/ethnicity. Our findings may inform targeted interventions for a geographic area, and further highlight the importance of guideline-conforming care to reduce disease burden.

Suggested Citation

  • Tara Castellano & Andrew K ElHabr & Christina Washington & Jie Ting & Yitong J Zhang & Fernanda Musa & Ezgi Berksoy & Kathleen Moore & Leslie Randall & Jagpreet Chhatwal & Turgay Ayer & Charles A Leat, 2024. "Health disparities in cervical cancer: Estimating geographic variations of disease burden and association with key socioeconomic and demographic factors in the US," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-14, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0307282
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0307282
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0307282&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0307282?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wonsuk Yoo & Sangmi Kim & Warner K Huh & Sarah Dilley & Steven S Coughlin & Edward E Partridge & Yunmi Chung & Vivian Dicks & Jae-Kwan Lee & Sejong Bae, 2017. "Recent trends in racial and regional disparities in cervical cancer incidence and mortality in United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chia-Yi Lee & Yu-Li Chen & Ying-Cheng Chiang & Ching-Yu Cheng & Yen-Ling Lai & Yi-Jou Tai & Heng-Cheng Hsu & Hsiao-Lin Hwa & Wen-Fang Cheng, 2020. "Outcome and Subsequent Pregnancy after Fertility-Sparing Surgery of Early-Stage Cervical Cancers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-11, September.
    2. Xiao Xu & Ling Chen & Marcella Nunez-Smith & Mitchell Clark & Jason D Wright, 2023. "Timeliness of diagnostic evaluation for postmenopausal bleeding: A retrospective cohort study using claims data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Mani, Sneha Sarah & Schut, Rebecca Anna, 2023. "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on inequalities in preventive health screenings: Trends and implications for U.S. population health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0307282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.