IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0303036.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Video Manipulation Effect (VME): A quantification of the possible impact that the ordering of YouTube videos might have on opinions and voting preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Epstein
  • Alex Flores

Abstract

Recent research has identified a number of powerful new forms of influence that the internet and related technologies have made possible. Randomized, controlled experiments have shown, for example, that when results generated by search engines are presented to undecided voters, if those search results favor one political candidate over another, the opinions and voting preferences of those voters can shift dramatically–by up to 80% in some demographic groups. The present study employed a YouTube simulator to identify and quantify another powerful form of influence that the internet has made possible, which we have labeled the Video Manipulation Effect (VME). In two randomized, controlled, counterbalanced, double-blind experiments with a total of 1,463 politically-diverse, eligible US voters, we show that when a sequence of videos displayed by the simulator is biased to favor one political candidate, and especially when the “up-next” video suggested by the simulator favors that candidate, both the opinions and voting preferences of undecided voters shift dramatically toward that candidate. Voting preferences shifted by between 51.5% and 65.6% overall, and by more than 75% in some demographic groups. We also tested a method for masking the bias in video sequences so that awareness of bias was greatly reduced. In 2018, a YouTube official revealed that 70% of the time people spend watching videos on the site, they are watching content that has been suggested by the company’s recommender algorithms. If the findings in the present study largely apply to YouTube, this popular video platform might have unprecedented power to impact thinking and behavior worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Epstein & Alex Flores, 2024. "The Video Manipulation Effect (VME): A quantification of the possible impact that the ordering of YouTube videos might have on opinions and voting preferences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-25, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0303036
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0303036
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0303036&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0303036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Massimo Airoldi & Davide Beraldo & Alessandro Gandini, 2016. "Follow the algorithm : An exploratory investigation of music on YouTube," Post-Print hal-02312191, HAL.
    2. Camille Roth & Antoine Mazières & Telmo Menezes, 2020. "Tubes and bubbles topological confinement of YouTube recommendations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Rieder, Bernhard & Hofmann, Jeanette, 2020. "Towards platform observability," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 9(4), pages 1-28.
    4. Ujué Agudo & Helena Matute, 2021. "The influence of algorithms on political and dating decisions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Robert Epstein & Vivian Lee & Roger Mohr & Vanessa R Zankich, 2022. "The Answer Bot Effect (ABE): A powerful new form of influence made possible by intelligent personal assistants and search engines," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-26, June.
    6. Kumar, Sangeet, 2019. "The algorithmic dance: YouTube's Adpocalypse and the gatekeeping of cultural content on digital platforms," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 8(2), pages 1-21.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ariadna Matamoros-Fernández & Joanne E. Gray & Louisa Bartolo & Jean Burgess & Nicolas Suzor, 2021. "What’s “Up Next”? Investigating Algorithmic Recommendations on YouTube Across Issues and Over Time," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 234-249.
    2. Dana Adriana Lupșa-Tătaru & Radu Lixăndroiu, 2022. "YouTube Channels, Subscribers, Uploads and Views: A Multidimensional Analysis of the First 1700 Channels from July 2022," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-13, October.
    3. Diane Felmlee & Sara Francisco & Melissa Hardy, 2024. "Networks of Negativity: Gaining Attention Through Cyberbullying," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(12), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Hallinan, Blake & Reynolds, C. J. & Kuperberg, Yehonatan & Rothenstein, Omer, 2025. "Aspirational platform governance: How creators legitimise content moderation through accusations of bias," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 14(1), pages 1-28.
    5. Robert Epstein & Vivian Lee & Roger Mohr & Vanessa R Zankich, 2022. "The Answer Bot Effect (ABE): A powerful new form of influence made possible by intelligent personal assistants and search engines," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-26, June.
    6. Steffen Lepa & Jochen Steffens & Martin Herzog & Hauke Egermann, 2020. "Popular Music as Entertainment Communication: How Perceived Semantic Expression Explains Liking of Previously Unknown Music," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 191-204.
    7. Balázs Bodó & Heleen Janssen, 2022. "Maintaining trust in a technologized public sector [Machine Bias]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 41(3), pages 414-429.
    8. Iglesias Keller, Clara, 2021. "Don’t Shoot the Message: Regulating Disinformation Beyond Content," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 18(99), pages 486-515.
    9. Mantello, Peter & Ho, Tung Manh & Nguyen, Minh-Hoang & Vuong, Quan-Hoang, 2021. "My Boss the Computer: A Bayesian analysis of socio-demographic and cross-cultural determinants of attitude toward the Non-Human Resource Management," OSF Preprints 4exjs, Center for Open Science.
    10. David Hartmann & Sonja Mei Wang & Lena Pohlmann & Bettina Berendt, 2025. "A systematic review of echo chamber research: comparative analysis of conceptualizations, operationalizations, and varying outcomes," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 1-59, May.
    11. Ulbricht, Lena & Egbert, Simon, 2024. "In Palantir we trust? Regulation of data analysis platforms in public security," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15.
    12. Valentin Niebler, 2020. "‘YouTubers unite’: collective action by YouTube content creators," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 26(2), pages 223-227, May.
    13. Ariadna Matamoros-Fernández & Joanne E. Gray & Louisa Bartolo & Jean Burgess & Nicolas Suzor, 2021. "What’s “Up Next”? Investigating Algorithmic Recommendations on YouTube Across Issues and Over Time," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 234-249.
    14. Griffin, Rachel, 2023. "From brand safety to suitability: Advertisers in platform governance," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 12(3), pages 1-25.
    15. Steffen Lepa & Jochen Steffens & Martin Herzog & Hauke Egermann, 2020. "Popular Music as Entertainment Communication: How Perceived Semantic Expression Explains Liking of Previously Unknown Music," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 191-204.
    16. Naroa Martínez & Aranzazu Vinas & Helena Matute, 2021. "Examining potential gender bias in automated-job alerts in the Spanish market," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0303036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.