IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0301351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How are people coping with working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic?: Experiences from the Netherlands and South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • So Yeon Park
  • Rachel Lee
  • Caroline Newton
  • Gisung Han

Abstract

COVID-19 has made working from home routine for many. People who have had to maintain their productivity, particularly in physically and/or socially unacceptable home-working situations, experienced one of the pandemic’s disadvantages. The experience can vary substantially among individuals as well as by country. This study presents the results of a comparative study of the Netherlands and Korea. Working from home was not uncommon in the Netherlands before the pandemic; however, in Korea, employers adopted working from home from its start, and that increased rapidly. An online survey enabled us to compare the physical and social conditions of current home workspaces in both countries, to understand how well-equipped they were to support people who had to work from home. We studied the changes in productivity and physical/mental health before and during COVID-19, to learn how people coped with working from home in both countries. Contrary to expectations, Koreans showed better scores than people in the Netherlands, in terms of changes in health and productivity. This article discusses various aspects of that result, such as satisfaction with home workspace, housing type, job position and prior experience, compulsoriness, and frequency of working from home. Relieving stress and concentration appeared to be the most important dimensions of telecommuters’ satisfaction with working from home environments in both countries. The results are the basis for suggesting the development of strategies for a desirable WFH environment, considering different background contexts, experiences and cultures.

Suggested Citation

  • So Yeon Park & Rachel Lee & Caroline Newton & Gisung Han, 2024. "How are people coping with working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic?: Experiences from the Netherlands and South Korea," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-20, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0301351
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0301351
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0301351&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0301351?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iris Arbogast & Charles S. Gascon & Andrew Spewak, 2019. "Working from Home: More Americans Are Telecommuting," The Regional Economist, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 27(3).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Morris A Davis & Andra C Ghent & Jesse Gregory, 2024. "The Work-From-Home Technology Boon and its Consequences," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 91(6), pages 3362-3401.
    2. Bill Dupor, 2020. "Possible Fiscal Policies for Rare, Unanticipated, and Severe Viral Outbreaks," Economic Synopses, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue 6, March.
    3. Pender, John & Goldstein, Joshua & Mahoney-Nair, Devika, 2022. "Impacts of the Broadband Initiatives Program on broadband adoption and home telework," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0301351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.