IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0300780.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating population-level interventions to reduce inappropriate antibiotic use in healthcare and community settings: A systematic review protocol

Author

Listed:
  • Shishi Wu
  • Olivia Magwood
  • Quanfang Dong
  • Xiaolin Wei

Abstract

Background: Inappropriate antibiotic use contributes significantly to the global challenge of antimicrobial resistance. While government-initiated population-level interventions are fundamental in addressing this issue, their full potential remains to be explored. This systematic review aims to assess the effectiveness of such interventions in reducing inappropriate antibiotic use among antibiotic providers and users in healthcare and community settings. Methods: We will conduct a systematic literature search across multiple databases and grey literature sources. We will include studies which evaluate the effectiveness of population-level interventions to reduce inappropriate antibiotic use in healthcare and community settings in both high-income and low- and middle-income countries. This includes government-initiated measures targeting antibiotic use through education, restriction, incentivization, coercion, training, persuasion, context modification, behavior modeling, or barrier reduction. Two reviewers will independently perform screening to select eligible studies, followed by data extraction. The outcomes of interest are various measures of antibiotic prescription and consumption, such as Defined Daily Dose (DDD) or number of prescriptions per year. We anticipate including a broad range of study designs and outcome measures. Therefore, we will narratively synthesize results using the categories of the population-level policy interventions of the Behavior Change Wheel Framework. We will organize outcome data by economic contexts, target populations, and implementation settings. Discussion: This review will strengthen the evidence base for the use of population-level interventions to address inappropriate antibiotic use. Drawing lessons from global experiences, the findings will provide valuable guidance to health policymakers, public health authorities, and researchers on tailoring interventions to specific economic contexts, populations, and settings, thereby enhancing their capacity to drive substantial improvement in appropriate antibiotic use.

Suggested Citation

  • Shishi Wu & Olivia Magwood & Quanfang Dong & Xiaolin Wei, 2024. "Evaluating population-level interventions to reduce inappropriate antibiotic use in healthcare and community settings: A systematic review protocol," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-8, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0300780
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0300780
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0300780&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0300780?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susan Rogers Van Katwyk & Jeremy M Grimshaw & Miriam Nkangu & Ranjana Nagi & Marc Mendelson & Monica Taljaard & Steven J Hoffman, 2019. "Government policy interventions to reduce human antimicrobial use: A systematic review and evidence map," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gotham, Dzintars & Moja, Lorenzo & van der Heijden, Maarten & Paulin, Sarah & Smith, Ingrid & Beyer, Peter, 2021. "Reimbursement models to tackle market failures for antimicrobials: Approaches taken in France, Germany, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(3), pages 296-306.
    2. Niklas Harring & Eva M. Krockow, 2021. "The social dilemmas of climate change and antibiotic resistance: an analytic comparison and discussion of policy implications," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Özçelik, Ece A & Doucet, Cédric & Kang, Hyunjin & Levy, Noémie & Feldhaus, Isabelle & Hashiguchi, Tiago Cravo Oliveira & Lerouge, Aliénor & Cecchini, Michele, 2022. "A comparative assessment of action plans on antimicrobial resistance from OECD and G20 countries using natural language processing," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(6), pages 522-533.
    4. Ashok J. Tamhankar & Ramesh Nachimuthu & Ravikant Singh & Jyoti Harindran & Gautam Kumar Meghwanshi & Rajesh Kannan & Nachimuthu Senthil Kumar & Vikrant Negi & Lijy Jacob & Sayan Bhattacharyya & Krush, 2019. "Characteristics of a Nationwide Voluntary Antibiotic Resistance Awareness Campaign in India; Future Paths and Pointers for Resource Limited Settings/Low and Middle Income Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Ashok J. Tamhankar & Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg, 2019. "Antimicrobials and Antimicrobial Resistance in the Environment and Its Remediation: A Global One Health Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-7, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0300780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.