IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0299653.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine learning algorithm for ventilator mode selection, pressure and volume control

Author

Listed:
  • Anitha T.
  • Gopu G.
  • Arun Mozhi Devan P.
  • Maher Assaad

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation techniques are vital for preserving individuals with a serious condition lives in the prolonged hospitalization unit. Nevertheless, an imbalance amid the hospitalized people demands and the respiratory structure could cause to inconsistencies in the patient’s inhalation. To tackle this problem, this study presents an Iterative Learning PID Controller (ILC-PID), a unique current cycle feedback type controller that helps in gaining the correct pressure and volume. The paper also offers a clear and complete examination of the primarily efficient neural approach for generating optimal inhalation strategies. Moreover, machine learning-based classifiers are used to evaluate the precision and performance of the ILC-PID controller. These classifiers able to forecast and choose the perfect type for various inhalation modes, eliminating the likelihood that patients will require mechanical ventilation. In pressure control, the suggested accurate neural categorization exhibited an average accuracy rate of 88.2% in continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) mode and 91.7% in proportional assist ventilation (PAV) mode while comparing with the other classifiers like ensemble classifier has reduced accuracy rate of 69.5% in CPAP mode and also 71.7% in PAV mode. An average accuracy of 78.9% rate in other classifiers compared to neutral network in CPAP. The neural model had an typical range of 81.6% in CPAP mode and 84.59% in PAV mode for 20 cm H2O of volume created by the neural network classifier in the volume investigation. Compared to the other classifiers, an average of 72.17% was in CPAP mode, and 77.83% was in PAV mode in volume control. Different approaches, such as decision trees, optimizable Bayes trees, naive Bayes trees, nearest neighbour trees, and an ensemble of trees, were also evaluated regarding the accuracy by confusion matrix concept, training duration, specificity, sensitivity, and F1 score.

Suggested Citation

  • Anitha T. & Gopu G. & Arun Mozhi Devan P. & Maher Assaad, 2024. "Machine learning algorithm for ventilator mode selection, pressure and volume control," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-34, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0299653
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0299653
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0299653&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0299653?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Limin Yu & Alexandra Halalau & Bhavinkumar Dalal & Amr E Abbas & Felicia Ivascu & Mitual Amin & Girish B Nair, 2021. "Machine learning methods to predict mechanical ventilation and mortality in patients with COVID-19," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Raymond Chang & Khaled Mossad Elhusseiny & Yu-Chang Yeh & Wei-Zen Sun, 2021. "COVID-19 ICU and mechanical ventilation patient characteristics and outcomes—A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0299653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.