IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-62121-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Real-time prediction of intensive care unit patient acuity and therapy requirements using state-space modelling

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel Contreras

    (University of Florida
    University of Florida)

  • Brandon Silva

    (University of Florida
    University of Florida)

  • Benjamin Shickel

    (University of Florida
    University of Florida)

  • Andrea Davidson

    (University of Florida
    University of Florida)

  • Tezcan Ozrazgat-Baslanti

    (University of Florida
    University of Florida)

  • Yuanfang Ren

    (University of Florida
    University of Florida)

  • Ziyuan Guan

    (University of Florida
    University of Florida)

  • Jeremy Balch

    (University of Florida
    University of Florida)

  • Jiaqing Zhang

    (University of Florida
    University of Florida)

  • Sabyasachi Bandyopadhyay

    (Stanford University)

  • Tyler Loftus

    (University of Florida
    University of Florida)

  • Kia Khezeli

    (University of Florida
    University of Florida)

  • Gloria Lipori

    (University of Florida)

  • Jessica Sena

    (University of Florida
    University of Florida)

  • Subhash Nerella

    (University of Florida
    University of Florida)

  • Azra Bihorac

    (University of Florida
    University of Florida)

  • Parisa Rashidi

    (University of Florida
    University of Florida)

Abstract

Intensive care unit (ICU) patients often experience rapid changes in clinical status, requiring timely identification of deterioration to guide life-sustaining interventions. Current artificial intelligence (AI) models for acuity assessment rely on mortality as a proxy and lack direct prediction of clinical instability or treatment needs. Here we present APRICOT-M, a state-space model to predict real-time ICU acuity outcomes and transitions, and the need for life-sustaining therapies within the next four hours. The model integrates vital signs, laboratory results, medications, assessment scores, and patient characteristics, to make predictions, handling sparse, irregular data efficiently. Our model is trained on over 140,000 ICU admissions across 55 hospitals and validated on external and real-time data, outperforming clinical scores in predicting mortality and instability. The model demonstrates clinical relevance, with physicians reporting alerts as actionable and timely in a substantial portion of cases. These results highlight APRICOT-M’s potential to support earlier, more informed ICU interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel Contreras & Brandon Silva & Benjamin Shickel & Andrea Davidson & Tezcan Ozrazgat-Baslanti & Yuanfang Ren & Ziyuan Guan & Jeremy Balch & Jiaqing Zhang & Sabyasachi Bandyopadhyay & Tyler Loftus &, 2025. "Real-time prediction of intensive care unit patient acuity and therapy requirements using state-space modelling," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-62121-1
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-62121-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-62121-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-62121-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mirela Tiglis & Ileana Peride & Iulia Alexandra Florea & Andrei Niculae & Lucian Cristian Petcu & Tiberiu Paul Neagu & Ionel Alexandru Checherita & Ioana Marina Grintescu, 2022. "Overview of Renal Replacement Therapy Use in a General Intensive Care Unit," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-11, February.
    2. Limin Yu & Alexandra Halalau & Bhavinkumar Dalal & Amr E Abbas & Felicia Ivascu & Mitual Amin & Girish B Nair, 2021. "Machine learning methods to predict mechanical ventilation and mortality in patients with COVID-19," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anitha T. & Gopu G. & Arun Mozhi Devan P. & Maher Assaad, 2024. "Machine learning algorithm for ventilator mode selection, pressure and volume control," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-34, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-62121-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.