IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0297271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of differentially private synthetic data for utility and fairness in end-to-end machine learning pipelines for tabular data

Author

Listed:
  • Mayana Pereira
  • Meghana Kshirsagar
  • Sumit Mukherjee
  • Rahul Dodhia
  • Juan Lavista Ferres
  • Rafael de Sousa

Abstract

Differentially private (DP) synthetic datasets are a solution for sharing data while preserving the privacy of individual data providers. Understanding the effects of utilizing DP synthetic data in end-to-end machine learning pipelines impacts areas such as health care and humanitarian action, where data is scarce and regulated by restrictive privacy laws. In this work, we investigate the extent to which synthetic data can replace real, tabular data in machine learning pipelines and identify the most effective synthetic data generation techniques for training and evaluating machine learning models. We systematically investigate the impacts of differentially private synthetic data on downstream classification tasks from the point of view of utility as well as fairness. Our analysis is comprehensive and includes representatives of the two main types of synthetic data generation algorithms: marginal-based and GAN-based. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first that: (i) proposes a training and evaluation framework that does not assume that real data is available for testing the utility and fairness of machine learning models trained on synthetic data; (ii) presents the most extensive analysis of synthetic dataset generation algorithms in terms of utility and fairness when used for training machine learning models; and (iii) encompasses several different definitions of fairness. Our findings demonstrate that marginal-based synthetic data generators surpass GAN-based ones regarding model training utility for tabular data. Indeed, we show that models trained using data generated by marginal-based algorithms can exhibit similar utility to models trained using real data. Our analysis also reveals that the marginal-based synthetic data generated using AIM and MWEM PGM algorithms can train models that simultaneously achieve utility and fairness characteristics close to those obtained by models trained with real data.

Suggested Citation

  • Mayana Pereira & Meghana Kshirsagar & Sumit Mukherjee & Rahul Dodhia & Juan Lavista Ferres & Rafael de Sousa, 2024. "Assessment of differentially private synthetic data for utility and fairness in end-to-end machine learning pipelines for tabular data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(2), pages 1-24, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0297271
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0297271
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0297271&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0297271?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matias Barenstein, 2019. "ProPublica's COMPAS Data Revisited," Papers 1906.04711, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2019.
    2. Chao Yan & Yao Yan & Zhiyu Wan & Ziqi Zhang & Larsson Omberg & Justin Guinney & Sean D. Mooney & Bradley A. Malin, 2022. "A Multifaceted benchmarking of synthetic electronic health record generation models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qi Chang & Zhennan Yan & Mu Zhou & Hui Qu & Xiaoxiao He & Han Zhang & Lohendran Baskaran & Subhi Al’Aref & Hongsheng Li & Shaoting Zhang & Dimitris N. Metaxas, 2023. "Mining multi-center heterogeneous medical data with distributed synthetic learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Brandon Theodorou & Cao Xiao & Jimeng Sun, 2023. "Synthesize high-dimensional longitudinal electronic health records via hierarchical autoregressive language model," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Severin Elvatun & Daan Knoors & Simon Brant & Christian Jonasson & Jan F Nygård, 2025. "Synthetic data as external control arms in scarce single-arm clinical trials," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(1), pages 1-13, January.
    4. Fabian Sven Karst & Mahei Manhai Li & Jan Marco Leimeister, 2025. "SynDEc: A Synthetic Data Ecosystem," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-28, December.
    5. Short, Martin B. & Mohler, George O., 2023. "A fully Bayesian tracking algorithm for mitigating disparate prediction misclassification," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1238-1252.
    6. Anmol Arora & Ananya Arora, 2023. "Machine learning models trained on synthetic datasets of multiple sample sizes for the use of predicting blood pressure from clinical data in a national dataset," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-10, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0297271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.