IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0295669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Just say ‘I don’t know’: Understanding information stagnation during a highly ambiguous visual search task

Author

Listed:
  • Hayward J Godwin
  • Michael C Hout

Abstract

Visual search experiments typically involve participants searching simple displays with two potential response options: ‘present’ or ‘absent’. Here we examined search behavior and decision-making when participants were tasked with searching ambiguous displays whilst also being given a third response option: ‘I don’t know’. Participants searched for a simple target (the letter ‘o’) amongst other letters in the displays. We made the target difficult to detect by increasing the degree to which letters overlapped in the displays. The results showed that as overlap increased, participants were more likely to respond ‘I don’t know’, as expected. RT analyses demonstrated that ‘I don’t know’ responses occurred at a later time than ‘present’ responses (but before ‘absent’ responses) when the overlap was low. By contrast, when the overlap was high, ‘I don’t know’ responses occurred very rapidly. We discuss the implications of our findings for current models and theories in terms of what we refer to as ‘information stagnation’ during visual search.

Suggested Citation

  • Hayward J Godwin & Michael C Hout, 2023. "Just say ‘I don’t know’: Understanding information stagnation during a highly ambiguous visual search task," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(12), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0295669
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0295669
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0295669&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0295669?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeremy M. Wolfe & Todd S. Horowitz & Naomi M. Kenner, 2005. "Rare items often missed in visual searches," Nature, Nature, vol. 435(7041), pages 439-440, May.
    2. repec:plo:pone00:0130834 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Orth, Ulrich R. & Crouch, Roberta C., 2014. "Is Beauty in the Aisles of the Retailer? Package Processing in Visually Complex Contexts," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(4), pages 524-537.
    2. Lara Christina Roll & Oi-ling Siu & Simon Y.W. Li & Hans De Witte, 2019. "Human Error: The Impact of Job Insecurity on Attention-Related Cognitive Errors and Error Detection," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-61, July.
    3. Lanfang Zhang & Boyu Cui & Minhao Yang & Feng Guo & Junhua Wang, 2019. "Effect of Using Mobile Phones on Driver’s Control Behavior Based on Naturalistic Driving Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-13, April.
    4. Frank van der Horst & Jelle Miedema & Joshua Snell & Jan Theeuwes, 2020. "Banknote verification relies on vision, feel and a single second," Working Papers 680, DNB.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0295669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.