IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0292812.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“It would really support the wider harm reduction agenda across the board”: A qualitative study of the potential impacts of drug checking service delivery in Scotland

Author

Listed:
  • Danilo Falzon
  • Tessa Parkes
  • Hannah Carver
  • Wendy Masterton
  • Bruce Wallace
  • Vicki Craik
  • Fiona Measham
  • Harry Sumnall
  • Rosalind Gittins
  • Carole Hunter
  • Kira Watson
  • John D Mooney
  • Elizabeth V Aston

Abstract

Drug checking services (DCS) enable individuals to voluntarily submit a small amount of a substance for analysis, providing information about the content of the substance along with tailored harm reduction support and advice. There is some evidence suggesting that DCS may lead to behaviour and system change, with impacts for people who use drugs, staff and services, and public health structures. The evidence base is still relatively nascent, however, and several evidence gaps persist. This paper reports on qualitative interviews with forty-three participants across three Scottish cities where the implementation of community-based DCS is being planned. Participants were drawn from three groups: professional participants; people with experience of drug use; and affected family members. Findings focus on perceived harm reduction impacts of DCS delivery in Scotland, with participants highlighting the potential for drug checking to impact a number of key groups including: individual service users; harm reduction services and staff; drug market monitoring structures and networks; and wider groups of people who use and sell drugs, in shaping their interactions with the drug market. Whilst continued evaluation of individual health behaviour outcomes is crucial to building the evidence base for DCS, the findings highlight the importance of extending evaluation beyond these outcomes. This would include evaluation of processes such as: information sharing across a range of parties; engagement with harm reduction and treatment services; knowledge building; and increased drug literacy. These broader dynamics may be particularly important for evaluations of community-based DCS serving individuals at higher-risk, given the complex relationship between information provision and health behaviour change which may be mediated by mental and physical health, stigma, criminalisation and the risk environment. This paper is of international relevance and adds to existing literature on the potential impact of DCS on individuals, organisations, and public health structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Danilo Falzon & Tessa Parkes & Hannah Carver & Wendy Masterton & Bruce Wallace & Vicki Craik & Fiona Measham & Harry Sumnall & Rosalind Gittins & Carole Hunter & Kira Watson & John D Mooney & Elizabet, 2023. "“It would really support the wider harm reduction agenda across the board”: A qualitative study of the potential impacts of drug checking service delivery in Scotland," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(12), pages 1-22, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0292812
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292812
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0292812
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0292812&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0292812?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samantha Davis & Bruce Wallace & Thea Van Roode & Dennis Hore, 2022. "Substance Use Stigma and Community Drug Checking: A Qualitative Study Examining Barriers and Possible Responses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Wendy Masterton & Danilo Falzon & Gillian Burton & Hannah Carver & Bruce Wallace & Elizabeth V. Aston & Harry Sumnall & Fiona Measham & Rosalind Gittins & Vicki Craik & Joe Schofield & Simon Little & , 2022. "A Realist Review of How Community-Based Drug Checking Services Could Be Designed and Implemented to Promote Engagement of People Who Use Drugs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-25, September.
    3. Betsos, Alex & Valleriani, Jenna & Boyd, Jade & McNeil, Ryan, 2022. "Beyond co-production: The construction of drug checking knowledge in a Canadian supervised injection facility," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    4. Margot Balcaen & Mireia Ventura & Cristina Gil & Anton Luf & Daniel Martins & Mar Cunha & Karsten Tögel-Lins & Danny Wolf & Peter Blanckaert & Eric Deconinck, 2023. "Challenges in Drug Surveillance: Strengthening the Analysis of New Psychoactive Substances by Harmonizing Drug Checking Services in Proficiency Testing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-10, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anthony Mullin & Mark Scott & Giorgia Vaccaro & Rosalind Gittins & Salvatore Ferla & Fabrizio Schifano & Amira Guirguis, 2023. "Handheld Raman Spectroscopy in the First UK Home Office Licensed Pharmacist-Led Community Drug Checking Service," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-27, March.
    2. Jeff Ondocsin & Daniel Ciccarone & Lissa Moran & Simon Outram & Dan Werb & Laura Thomas & Emily A. Arnold, 2023. "Insights from Drug Checking Programs: Practicing Bootstrap Public Health Whilst Tailoring to Local Drug User Needs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(11), pages 1-19, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0292812. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.