IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0291275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Foveal feedback in perceptual processing: Contamination of neural representations and task difficulty effects

Author

Listed:
  • Giulio Contemori
  • Carolina Maria Oletto
  • Luca Battaglini
  • Elena Motterle
  • Marco Bertamini

Abstract

Visual object recognition was traditionally believed to rely on a hierarchical feedforward process. However, recent evidence challenges this notion by demonstrating the crucial role of foveal retinotopic cortex and feedback signals from higher-level visual areas in processing peripheral visual information. The nature of the information conveyed through foveal feedback remains a topic of debate. To address this, we conducted a study employing a foveal mask paradigm with varying stimulus-mask onset asynchronies in a peripheral same/different task, where peripheral objects exhibited different degrees of similarity. Our hypothesis posited that simultaneous arrival of feedback and mask information in the foveal cortex would lead to neural contamination, biasing perception. Notably, when the two peripheral objects were identical, we observed a significant increase in the number of "different" responses, peaking at approximately 100 ms. Similar effect was found when the objects were dissimilar, but with an overall later timing (around 150 ms). No significant difference was found when comparing easy (dissimilar objects) and difficult trials (similar objects). The findings challenge the hypothesis that foveation planning alone accounts for the observed effects. Instead, these and previous observations support the notion that the foveal cortex serves as a visual sketchpad for maintaining and manipulating task-relevant information.

Suggested Citation

  • Giulio Contemori & Carolina Maria Oletto & Luca Battaglini & Elena Motterle & Marco Bertamini, 2023. "Foveal feedback in perceptual processing: Contamination of neural representations and task difficulty effects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(10), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0291275
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0291275
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0291275&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0291275?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephenie A. Harrison & Frank Tong, 2009. "Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas," Nature, Nature, vol. 458(7238), pages 632-635, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:plo:pone00:0020801 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Duncan Edward Astle & Anna Christina Nobre & Gaia Scerif, 2009. "Applying an Attentional Set to Perceived and Remembered Features," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(10), pages 1-12, October.
    3. Mrugank Dake & Clayton E. Curtis, 2025. "Perturbing human V1 degrades the fidelity of visual working memory," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-8, December.
    4. Kay H Brodersen & Thomas M Schofield & Alexander P Leff & Cheng Soon Ong & Ekaterina I Lomakina & Joachim M Buhmann & Klaas E Stephan, 2011. "Generative Embedding for Model-Based Classification of fMRI Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Juan Linde-Domingo & Bernhard Spitzer, 2024. "Geometry of visuospatial working memory information in miniature gaze patterns," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(2), pages 336-348, February.
    6. repec:plo:pbio00:3000239 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. repec:plo:pone00:0214937 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Nadine Dijkstra & Stephen M. Fleming, 2023. "Subjective signal strength distinguishes reality from imagination," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Serra E. Favila & Brice A. Kuhl & Jonathan Winawer, 2022. "Perception and memory have distinct spatial tuning properties in human visual cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Kai Ueltzhöffer & Diana J N Armbruster-Genç & Christian J Fiebach, 2015. "Stochastic Dynamics Underlying Cognitive Stability and Flexibility," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-46, June.
    11. Mohammad Zia Ul Haq Katshu & Giovanni d'Avossa, 2014. "Fine-Grained, Local Maps and Coarse, Global Representations Support Human Spatial Working Memory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-13, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0291275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.