IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0290382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic review and meta-analysis of thigmotactic behaviour in the open field test in rodent models associated with persistent pain

Author

Listed:
  • Xue Ying Zhang
  • Marta Diaz-delCastillo
  • Lingsi Kong
  • Natasha Daniels
  • William MacIntosh-Smith
  • Aya Abdallah
  • Dominik Domanski
  • Denis Sofrenovic
  • Tsz Pui (Skel) Yeung
  • Diego Valiente
  • Jan Vollert
  • Emily Sena
  • Andrew S Rice
  • Nadia Soliman

Abstract

Thigmotaxis is an innate predator avoidance behaviour of rodents. To gain insight into how injury and disease models, and analgesic drug treatments affect thigmotaxis, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that assessed thigmotaxis in the open field test. Systematic searches were conducted of 3 databases in October 2020, March and August 2022. Study design characteristics and experimental data were extracted and analysed using a random-effects meta-analysis. We also assessed the correlation between thigmotaxis and stimulus-evoked limb withdrawal. This review included the meta-analysis of 165 studies We report thigmotaxis was increased in injury and disease models associated with persistent pain and this increase was attenuated by analgesic drug treatments in both rat and mouse experiments. Its usefulness, however, may be limited in certain injury and disease models because our analysis suggested that thigmotaxis may be associated with the locomotor function. We also conducted subgroup analyses and meta-regression, but our findings on sources of heterogeneity are inconclusive because analyses were limited by insufficient available data. It was difficult to assess internal validity because reporting of methodological quality measures was poor, therefore, the studies have an unclear risk of bias. The correlation between time in the centre (type of a thigmotactic metric) and types of stimulus-evoked limb withdrawal was inconsistent. Therefore, stimulus-evoked and ethologically relevant behavioural paradigms should be viewed as two separate entities as they are conceptually and methodologically different from each other.

Suggested Citation

  • Xue Ying Zhang & Marta Diaz-delCastillo & Lingsi Kong & Natasha Daniels & William MacIntosh-Smith & Aya Abdallah & Dominik Domanski & Denis Sofrenovic & Tsz Pui (Skel) Yeung & Diego Valiente & Jan Vol, 2023. "A systematic review and meta-analysis of thigmotactic behaviour in the open field test in rodent models associated with persistent pain," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-44, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0290382
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290382
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290382&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0290382?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emily S Sena & H Bart van der Worp & Philip M W Bath & David W Howells & Malcolm R Macleod, 2010. "Publication Bias in Reports of Animal Stroke Studies Leads to Major Overstatement of Efficacy," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-8, March.
    2. Nathalie Percie du Sert & Viki Hurst & Amrita Ahluwalia & Sabina Alam & Marc T Avey & Monya Baker & William J Browne & Alejandra Clark & Innes C Cuthill & Ulrich Dirnagl & Michael Emerson & Paul Garne, 2020. "The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(7), pages 1-12, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaoyi Cheng & Radwa Barakat & Giulia Pavani & Masuma Khatun Usha & Rodolfo Calderon & Elizabeth Snella & Abigail Gorden & Yudi Zhang & Paul Gadue & Deborah L. French & Karin S. Dorman & Antonella Fid, 2023. "Nod1-dependent NF-kB activation initiates hematopoietic stem cell specification in response to small Rho GTPases," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Lixiang Zhai & Haitao Xiao & Chengyuan Lin & Hoi Leong Xavier Wong & Yan Y. Lam & Mengxue Gong & Guojun Wu & Ziwan Ning & Chunhua Huang & Yijing Zhang & Chao Yang & Jingyuan Luo & Lu Zhang & Ling Zhao, 2023. "Gut microbiota-derived tryptamine and phenethylamine impair insulin sensitivity in metabolic syndrome and irritable bowel syndrome," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Karolína Ondrová & Iveta Zůvalová & Barbora Vyhlídalová & Kristýna Krasulová & Eva Miková & Radim Vrzal & Petr Nádvorník & Binod Nepal & Sandhya Kortagere & Martina Kopečná & David Kopečný & Marek Šeb, 2023. "Monoterpenoid aryl hydrocarbon receptor allosteric antagonists protect against ultraviolet skin damage in female mice," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Lisa Bero, 2018. "Meta-research matters: Meta-spin cycles, the blindness of bias, and rebuilding trust," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-4, April.
    5. L. Tanner & A. B. Single & R. K. V. Bhongir & M. Heusel & T. Mohanty & C. A. Q. Karlsson & L. Pan & C-M. Clausson & J. Bergwik & K. Wang & C. K. Andersson & R. M. Oommen & J. S. Erjefält & J. Malmströ, 2023. "Small-molecule-mediated OGG1 inhibition attenuates pulmonary inflammation and lung fibrosis in a murine lung fibrosis model," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. repec:plo:pone00:0043404 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Constance Holman & Sophie K Piper & Ulrike Grittner & Andreas Antonios Diamantaras & Jonathan Kimmelman & Bob Siegerink & Ulrich Dirnagl, 2016. "Where Have All the Rodents Gone? The Effects of Attrition in Experimental Research on Cancer and Stroke," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.
    8. S. M. Shatil Shahriar & Syed Muntazir Andrabi & Al-Murtadha Al-Gahmi & Zishuo Yan & Alec D. McCarthy & Chenlong Wang & Zakariya A. Yusuf & Navatha Shree Sharma & Milton E. Busquets & Mallory I. Nilles, 2025. "Bicomponent nano- and microfiber aerogels for effective management of junctional hemorrhage," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Bernhard Voelkl & Lucile Vogt & Emily S Sena & Hanno Würbel, 2018. "Reproducibility of preclinical animal research improves with heterogeneity of study samples," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-13, February.
    10. Umberto Cillo & Caterina Lonati & Alessandra Bertacco & Lucrezia Magnini & Michele Battistin & Lara Borsetto & Francesco Dazzi & David Al-Adra & Enrico Gringeri & Maria Laura Bacci & Andrea Schlegel &, 2025. "A proof-of-concept study in small and large animal models for coupling liver normothermic machine perfusion with mesenchymal stromal cell bioreactors," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Victoria Ozberk & Mehfuz Zaman & Ailin Lepletier & Sharareh Eskandari & Jacqualine Kaden & Jamie-Lee Mills & Ainslie Calcutt & Jessica Dooley & Yongbao Huo & Emma L. Langshaw & Glen C. Ulett & Michael, 2023. "A Glycolipidated-liposomal peptide vaccine confers long-term mucosal protection against Streptococcus pyogenes via IL-17, macrophages and neutrophils," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Jenny T van der Steen & Cornelis A van den Bogert & Mirjam C van Soest-Poortvliet & Soulmaz Fazeli Farsani & René H J Otten & Gerben ter Riet & Lex M Bouter, 2018. "Determinants of selective reporting: A taxonomy based on content analysis of a random selection of the literature," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, February.
    13. repec:plo:pmed00:1001010 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Brian P Walcott & Sameer A Sheth & Brian V Nahed & Jean-Valery Coumans, 2012. "Conflict of Interest in Spine Research Reporting," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-4, August.
    15. David Baker & Katie Lidster & Ana Sottomayor & Sandra Amor, 2014. "Two Years Later: Journals Are Not Yet Enforcing the ARRIVE Guidelines on Reporting Standards for Pre-Clinical Animal Studies," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-6, January.
    16. Annesha Sil & Marina Souza Matos & Mirela Delibegovic & Bettina Platt, 2023. "How stra(i)nge are your controls? A comparative analysis of metabolic phenotypes in commonly used C57BL/6 substrains," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-15, August.
    17. P. Bielefeld & A. Martirosyan & S. Martín-Suárez & A. Apresyan & G. F. Meerhoff & F. Pestana & S. Poovathingal & N. Reijner & W. Koning & R. A. Clement & I. Veen & E. M. Toledo & O. Polzer & I. Durá &, 2024. "Traumatic brain injury promotes neurogenesis at the cost of astrogliogenesis in the adult hippocampus of male mice," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    18. Hirotaka Iijima & Gabrielle Gilmer & Kai Wang & Allison C. Bean & Yuchen He & Hang Lin & Wan-Yee Tang & Daniel Lamont & Chia Tai & Akira Ito & Jeffrey J. Jones & Christopher Evans & Fabrisia Ambrosio, 2023. "Age-related matrix stiffening epigenetically regulates α-Klotho expression and compromises chondrocyte integrity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    19. Susanne Wieschowski & Diego S Silva & Daniel Strech, 2016. "Animal Study Registries: Results from a Stakeholder Analysis on Potential Strengths, Weaknesses, Facilitators, and Barriers," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-12, November.
    20. Robert Saddawi-Konefka & Aoife O’Farrell & Farhoud Faraji & Lauren Clubb & Michael M. Allevato & Shawn M. Jensen & Bryan S. Yung & Zhiyong Wang & Victoria H. Wu & Nana-Ama Anang & Riyam Al Msari & Shi, 2022. "Lymphatic-preserving treatment sequencing with immune checkpoint inhibition unleashes cDC1-dependent antitumor immunity in HNSCC," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    21. Yuu Okura & Yuri Ikawa-Teranishi & Akihiko Mizoroki & Noriyuki Takahashi & Takashi Tsushima & Machiko Irie & Zulkarnain Harfuddin & Momoko Miura-Okuda & Shunsuke Ito & Genki Nakamura & Hiroaki Takesue, 2023. "Characterizations of a neutralizing antibody broadly reactive to multiple gluten peptide:HLA-DQ2.5 complexes in the context of celiac disease," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    22. repec:plo:pbio00:1000413 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. repec:plo:pmed00:1001489 is not listed on IDEAS
    24. Konstantinos K Tsilidis & Orestis A Panagiotou & Emily S Sena & Eleni Aretouli & Evangelos Evangelou & David W Howells & Rustam Al-Shahi Salman & Malcolm R Macleod & John P A Ioannidis, 2013. "Evaluation of Excess Significance Bias in Animal Studies of Neurological Diseases," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-10, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0290382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.