IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0289275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal allocation of clusters in stepped wedge designs with a decaying correlation structure

Author

Listed:
  • Mirjam Moerbeek

Abstract

The cluster randomized stepped wedge design is a multi-period uni-directional switch design in which all clusters start in the control condition and at the beginning of each new period a random sample of clusters crosses over to the intervention condition. Such designs often use uniform allocation, with an equal number of clusters at each treatment switch. However, the uniform allocation is not necessarily the most efficient. This study derives the optimal allocation of clusters to treatment sequences in the cluster randomized stepped wedge design, for both cohort and cross-sectional designs. The correlation structure is exponential decay, meaning the correlation decreases with the time lag between two measurements. The optimal allocation is shown to depend on the intraclass correlation coefficient, the number of subjects per cluster-period and the cluster and (in the case of a cohort design) individual autocorrelation coefficients. For small to medium values of these autocorrelations those sequences that have their treatment switch earlier or later in the study are allocated a larger proportion of clusters than those clusters that have their treatment switch halfway the study. When the autocorrelation coefficients increase, the clusters become more equally distributed across the treatment sequences. For the cohort design, the optimal allocation is almost equal to the uniform allocation when both autocorrelations approach the value 1. For almost all scenarios that were studied, the efficiency of the uniform allocation is 0.8 or higher. R code to derive the optimal allocation is available online.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirjam Moerbeek, 2023. "Optimal allocation of clusters in stepped wedge designs with a decaying correlation structure," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0289275
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0289275
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0289275&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0289275?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lawrie, Jock & Carlin, John B. & Forbes, Andrew B., 2015. "Optimal stepped wedge designs," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 210-214.
    2. Moerbeek, Mirjam, 2005. "Randomization of Clusters Versus Randomization of Persons Within Clusters: Which Is Preferable?," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 59, pages 72-78, February.
    3. Moerbeek, Mirjam, 2005. "Randomization of Clusters Versus Randomization of Persons Within Clusters: Which Is Preferable?," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 59, pages 173-179, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gerard, Patrick D. & Schucany, William R., 2007. "An enhanced sign test for dependent binary data with small numbers of clusters," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(9), pages 4622-4632, May.
    2. Janne Tukiainen, 2017. "Effects of Minimum Bid Increments in Internet Auctions: Evidence from a Field Experiment," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(3), pages 597-622, September.
    3. Jessica Kasza & Andrew B. Forbes, 2019. "Information content of cluster–period cells in stepped wedge trials," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 144-152, March.
    4. Fan Li & Jessica Kasza & Elizabeth L. Turner & Paul J. Rathouz & Andrew B. Forbes & John S. Preisser, 2023. "Generalizing the information content for stepped wedge designs: A marginal modeling approach," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 50(3), pages 1048-1067, September.
    5. Ruoxuan Xiong & Susan Athey & Mohsen Bayati & Guido Imbens, 2024. "Optimal Experimental Design for Staggered Rollouts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(8), pages 5317-5336, August.
    6. John N. S. Matthews, 2020. "Highly efficient stepped wedge designs for clusters of unequal size," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 1167-1176, December.
    7. Li, Fan & Turner, Elizabeth L. & Preisser, John S., 2018. "Optimal allocation of clusters in cohort stepped wedge designs," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 257-263.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0289275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.