IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0288769.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation the validity and reliability of the perceived medical school stress scale in Turkish medical students

Author

Listed:
  • Esra Çınar Tanrıverdi
  • Sinan Yılmaz
  • Yasemin Çayır

Abstract

Medical education can be a challenging and stressful process. Additional stressors can make the medical education process even more complex and impair a student’s attention and concentration. To the authors’ knowledge, there is no valid and reliable scale to measure medical school stress in Turkish medical students. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the Perceived Medical School Stress (PMSS) Scale in Turkish medical students. The Perceived Medical School Stress Scale is a self-assessment tool developed to measure medical school-induced stress in medical students. It consists of 13 items divided into two subdimensions. Scale items are answered using a four-point (0–4) Likert system The total score that can be obtained from the PMSS ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating higher levels of perceived stress. First, the scale was applied as a pilot to 52 students by performing the scale’s back-and-forth translation into Turkish. Then, the scale was applied to 612 volunteer medical students to ensure validity. Convergent validity and confirmatory factor analysis are used to assess the construct validity of a scale. Test-retest, item correlations, and Cronbach’s alpha coefficients are used to evaluate the reliability of a scale. As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, the two-factor structure of the original scale was confirmed. The fit indices of the model obtained showed excellent fit. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) Scale was used for convergent validity. The GAD-7 is a self-assessment tool that measures the level of generalized anxiety. It is answered with a four-point Likert scale for the last two weeks. The score that can be obtained from the scale is between 0–21. A score of ten or more indicates possible anxiety disorder. The students’ mean perceived medical school stress score was 39.80±8.09, and their GAD-7 score was 11.0±5.5. A significant positive relationship was found between the total scores of the scales (r = .48, P .05). The Turkish version of the Perceived Medical School Stress Scale is a valid and reliable scale that can be used to investigate the medical school-specific stress of students.

Suggested Citation

  • Esra Çınar Tanrıverdi & Sinan Yılmaz & Yasemin Çayır, 2023. "Evaluation the validity and reliability of the perceived medical school stress scale in Turkish medical students," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0288769
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0288769
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0288769&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0288769?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vitaliano, Peter P. & Maiuro, Roland D. & Mitchell, Ellen & Russo, Joan, 1989. "Perceived stress in medical school: Resistors, persistors, adaptors and maladaptors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 28(12), pages 1321-1329, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0288769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.