IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0286742.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rhesus monkeys learn to control a directional-key inspired brain machine interface via bio-feedback

Author

Listed:
  • Chenguang Zhang
  • Hao Wang
  • Shaohua Tang
  • Zheng Li

Abstract

Brain machine interfaces (BMI) connect brains directly to the outside world, bypassing natural neural systems and actuators. Neuronal-activity-to-motion transformation algorithms allow applications such as control of prosthetics or computer cursors. These algorithms lie within a spectrum between bio-mimetic control and bio-feedback control. The bio-mimetic approach relies on increasingly complex algorithms to decode neural activity by mimicking the natural neural system and actuator relationship while focusing on machine learning: the supervised fitting of decoder parameters. On the other hand, the bio-feedback approach uses simple algorithms and relies primarily on user learning, which may take some time, but can facilitate control of novel, non-biological appendages. An increasing amount of work has focused on the arguably more successful bio-mimetic approach. However, as chronic recordings have become more accessible and utilization of novel appendages such as computer cursors have become more universal, users can more easily spend time learning in a bio-feedback control paradigm. We believe a simple approach which leverages user learning and few assumptions will provide users with good control ability. To test the feasibility of this idea, we implemented a simple firing-rate-to-motion correspondence rule, assigned groups of neurons to virtual “directional keys” for control of a 2D cursor. Though not strictly required, to facilitate initial control, we selected neurons with similar preferred directions for each group. The groups of neurons were kept the same across multiple recording sessions to allow learning. Two Rhesus monkeys used this BMI to perform a center-out cursor movement task. After about a week of training, monkeys performed the task better and neuronal signal patterns changed on a group basis, indicating learning. While our experiments did not compare this bio-feedback BMI to bio-mimetic BMIs, the results demonstrate the feasibility of our control paradigm and paves the way for further research in multi-dimensional bio-feedback BMIs.

Suggested Citation

  • Chenguang Zhang & Hao Wang & Shaohua Tang & Zheng Li, 2024. "Rhesus monkeys learn to control a directional-key inspired brain machine interface via bio-feedback," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(1), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0286742
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286742
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0286742
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0286742&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0286742?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meel Velliste & Sagi Perel & M. Chance Spalding & Andrew S. Whitford & Andrew B. Schwartz, 2008. "Cortical control of a prosthetic arm for self-feeding," Nature, Nature, vol. 453(7198), pages 1098-1101, June.
    2. Mijail D. Serruya & Nicholas G. Hatsopoulos & Liam Paninski & Matthew R. Fellows & John P. Donoghue, 2002. "Instant neural control of a movement signal," Nature, Nature, vol. 416(6877), pages 141-142, March.
    3. Chet T. Moritz & Steve I. Perlmutter & Eberhard E. Fetz, 2008. "Direct control of paralysed muscles by cortical neurons," Nature, Nature, vol. 456(7222), pages 639-642, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yasuhiko Nakanishi & Takufumi Yanagisawa & Duk Shin & Ryohei Fukuma & Chao Chen & Hiroyuki Kambara & Natsue Yoshimura & Masayuki Hirata & Toshiki Yoshimine & Yasuharu Koike, 2013. "Prediction of Three-Dimensional Arm Trajectories Based on ECoG Signals Recorded from Human Sensorimotor Cortex," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-9, August.
    2. repec:plo:pone00:0059049 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Nuri F Ince & Rahul Gupta & Sami Arica & Ahmed H Tewfik & James Ashe & Giuseppe Pellizzer, 2010. "High Accuracy Decoding of Movement Target Direction in Non-Human Primates Based on Common Spatial Patterns of Local Field Potentials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Shinsuke Koyama & Uri Eden & Emery Brown & Robert Kass, 2010. "Bayesian decoding of neural spike trains," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 62(1), pages 37-59, February.
    5. Zheng Li & Joseph E O'Doherty & Timothy L Hanson & Mikhail A Lebedev & Craig S Henriquez & Miguel A L Nicolelis, 2009. "Unscented Kalman Filter for Brain-Machine Interfaces," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(7), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Josh Merel & David Carlson & Liam Paninski & John P Cunningham, 2016. "Neuroprosthetic Decoder Training as Imitation Learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, May.
    7. repec:plo:pcbi00:1002578 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Linlin Li & Shufang Zhao & Wenhao Ran & Zhexin Li & Yongxu Yan & Bowen Zhong & Zheng Lou & Lili Wang & Guozhen Shen, 2022. "Dual sensing signal decoupling based on tellurium anisotropy for VR interaction and neuro-reflex system application," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Jonathan Eden & Mario Bräcklein & Jaime Ibáñez & Deren Yusuf Barsakcioglu & Giovanni Di Pino & Dario Farina & Etienne Burdet & Carsten Mehring, 2022. "Principles of human movement augmentation and the challenges in making it a reality," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Tobias Pistohl & Thomas Sebastian Benedikt Schmidt & Tonio Ball & Andreas Schulze-Bonhage & Ad Aertsen & Carsten Mehring, 2013. "Grasp Detection from Human ECoG during Natural Reach-to-Grasp Movements," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, January.
    11. Andrey Eliseyev & Tetiana Aksenova, 2016. "Penalized Multi-Way Partial Least Squares for Smooth Trajectory Decoding from Electrocorticographic (ECoG) Recording," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, May.
    12. Jose M Carmena, 2013. "Advances in Neuroprosthetic Learning and Control," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-4, May.
    13. Sean L. Metzger & Jessie R. Liu & David A. Moses & Maximilian E. Dougherty & Margaret P. Seaton & Kaylo T. Littlejohn & Josh Chartier & Gopala K. Anumanchipalli & Adelyn Tu-Chan & Karunesh Ganguly & E, 2022. "Generalizable spelling using a speech neuroprosthesis in an individual with severe limb and vocal paralysis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Lukas K. Amann & Virginia Casasnovas & Alexander Gail, 2025. "Visual target and task-critical feedback uncertainty impair different stages of reach planning in motor cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
    15. Tomislav Milekovic & Tonio Ball & Andreas Schulze-Bonhage & Ad Aertsen & Carsten Mehring, 2013. "Detection of Error Related Neuronal Responses Recorded by Electrocorticography in Humans during Continuous Movements," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-20, February.
    16. repec:osf:thesis:4j3fu_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Pavlov, A.N. & Grishina, D.S. & Runnova, A.E. & Maksimenko, V.A. & Pavlova, O.N. & Shchukovsky, N.V. & Hramov, A.E. & Kurths, J., 2019. "Recognition of electroencephalographic patterns related to human movements or mental intentions with multiresolution analysis," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 230-235.
    18. Andrés Úbeda & Enrique Hortal & Eduardo Iáñez & Carlos Perez-Vidal & Jose M Azorín, 2015. "Assessing Movement Factors in Upper Limb Kinematics Decoding from EEG Signals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-12, May.
    19. Sebastian Schleidgen & Orsolya Friedrich & Selin Gerlek & Galia Assadi & Johanna Seifert, 2023. "The concept of “interaction” in debates on human–machine interaction," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Han-Lin Hsieh & Maryam M Shanechi, 2018. "Optimizing the learning rate for adaptive estimation of neural encoding models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-34, May.
    21. V Anne Smith & Jing Yu & Tom V Smulders & Alexander J Hartemink & Erich D Jarvis, 2006. "Computational Inference of Neural Information Flow Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(11), pages 1-14, November.
    22. Javier M Antelis & Luis Montesano & Ander Ramos-Murguialday & Niels Birbaumer & Javier Minguez, 2013. "On the Usage of Linear Regression Models to Reconstruct Limb Kinematics from Low Frequency EEG Signals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-14, April.
    23. Jonathan A Michaels & Benjamin Dann & Hansjörg Scherberger, 2016. "Neural Population Dynamics during Reaching Are Better Explained by a Dynamical System than Representational Tuning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0286742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.