IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0286261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experiences and preferences for advance care planning following a diagnosis of dementia: Findings from a cross-sectional survey of carers

Author

Listed:
  • Jamie Bryant
  • Elise Mansfield
  • Emilie Cameron
  • Rob Sanson-Fisher

Abstract

Background: Future medical and financial planning is important for persons with dementia given the impact of the disease on capacity for decision making. Aims: To explore from the perspective of carers of persons with dementia: (1) Participation in future medical and financial planning by the person they care for, including when planning was undertaken and the characteristics associated with having an advance care directive completed; (2) The type of healthcare providers who discussed advance care planning following diagnosis; and (3) Preferences for timing of discussions about advance care planning following diagnosis. Methods: Recruitment and data collection took place between July 2018 and June 2020. Carers of persons with dementia aged 18 years and older were mailed a survey. Participants completed questions regarding completion of various future planning documents by the person they support, including time of completion and who discussed advance care planning following diagnosis. Participants were presented with information about the benefits and consequences of early and late discussions of advance care planning and asked when discussions about advance care planning were best initiated. Results: 198 carers participated. Most participants were female (74%) and had been a carer for more than 2 years (82%). Most participants reported that the person with dementia they support had made a Will (97%) and appointed an Enduring Guardian (93%) and Enduring Power of Attorney (89%). Only 47% had completed an advance care directive. No significant associations were found between characteristics of persons with dementia and completion of an advance care directive. Geriatricians (53%) and GPs (51%) most often discussed advance care planning following diagnosis. Most carers thought that discussions about advance care planning should occur in the first few weeks or months following diagnosis (32%), at the healthcare provider’s discretion (31%), or at the time of diagnosis (25%). Conclusions: More than half of persons with dementia do not have an advance care directive. There is variability in preferences for timing of discussions following dementia diagnosis.

Suggested Citation

  • Jamie Bryant & Elise Mansfield & Emilie Cameron & Rob Sanson-Fisher, 2023. "Experiences and preferences for advance care planning following a diagnosis of dementia: Findings from a cross-sectional survey of carers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(6), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0286261
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0286261
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0286261&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0286261?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:plo:pone00:0198535 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Douglas H. Blackwood & David Walker & Monty G. Mythen & Rachel M. Taylor & Cecilia Vindrola‐Padros, 2019. "Barriers to advance care planning with patients as perceived by nurses and other healthcare professionals: A systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4276-4297, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hsueh-Hsing Pan & Li-Fen Wu & Li-Fang Chang & Yu-Chun Hung & Chin Lin & Ching-Liang Ho, 2021. "Effects of Dispositional Resilience and Self-Efficacy on Practice in Advanced Care Planning of Terminally Ill Patients among Taiwanese Nurses: A Study Using Path Modeling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Anne Kuusisto & Jenni Santavirta & Kaija Saranto & Elina Haavisto, 2021. "Healthcare professionals’ perceptions of advance care planning in palliative care unit: a qualitative descriptive study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5-6), pages 633-644, March.
    3. Silvia Sörensen & Rachel L. Missell & Alexander Eustice‐Corwin & Dorine A. Otieno, 2021. "Perspectives on Aging‐Related Preparation," Journal of Elder Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(2), pages 163-221, March.
    4. Chen, Alice J. & Li, Jing, 2024. "Paying for advance care planning in medicare: Impacts on care and spending near end of life," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    5. Suet Ying Ng & Eliza Lai-Yi Wong, 2021. "The Role Complexities in Advance Care Planning for End-of-Life Care—Nursing Students’ Perception of the Nursing Profession," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-13, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0286261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.