IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0286169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trend of estimated participation rate by regional block, gender, and age group in the 1997–2019: National Health and Nutrition Survey in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Midori Ishikawa
  • Osamu Hemmi
  • Hidemi Takimoto
  • Mai Matsumoto
  • Tetsuji Yokoyama

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the trend of approximate participation rate in Japan’s National Health and Nutrition Survey (NHNS_J). The proportion of participants among all residents of surveyed districts (estimated participation rate: EPR) was calculated by 12 regional blocks, gender, and age group, and the trend and annual percent change (APC) were clarified. Based on the 1997–2019 NHNS_J data, we created a database classified by prefecture, gender, and age group; in addition to these, the number of people per household by Population Census or population estimates were obtained from e-Stat and added to the database. All analyses were performed by regional block and gender and EPR for each year was calculated by the age group. Trends of EPR, overall and by the age group, were presented using graphs, illustrating the exponential regression curve. The graphs showed APC, standard error, and statistical significance by age group. The EPRs were declining in all the regional blocks. Additionally, the rates of decline in APC in young people under the age of 50 years were higher than those in the older age groups in 9 of 12 regional blocks. The nationwide APC in the age group

Suggested Citation

  • Midori Ishikawa & Osamu Hemmi & Hidemi Takimoto & Mai Matsumoto & Tetsuji Yokoyama, 2024. "Trend of estimated participation rate by regional block, gender, and age group in the 1997–2019: National Health and Nutrition Survey in Japan," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0286169
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0286169
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0286169&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0286169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philipp Jaehn & Emily Mena & Sibille Merz & Robert Hoffmann & Antje Gößwald & Alexander Rommel & Christine Holmberg & on behalf of the ADVANCE GENDER study group, 2020. "Non-response in a national health survey in Germany: An intersectionality-informed multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, August.
    2. repec:plo:pone00:0242815 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jennifer W He & Amanda L Terry & Dan Lizotte & Greta Bauer & Bridget L Ryan, 2024. "Understanding intersectional inequality in access to primary care providers using multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(1), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Wilkes, Rima & Karimi, Aryan, 2024. "What does the MAIHDA method explain?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0286169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.