IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0281995.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge and attitudes of deaf persons towards safe abortion services in Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Wisdom Kwadwo Mprah
  • Juventus Duorinaah
  • Maxwell Peprah Opoku
  • William Nketsia
  • Michael Amponteng

Abstract

Background: Deafness refers to partial or total loss of hearing, which, if not appropriately accommodated, may interfere with day-to-day living experiences. Deaf people encountered challenges in their efforts to access essential services, such as health care. While some attention has been given to general access to reproductive health services, less research has focused on the experiences of deaf women and girls when accessing safe abortion services. With unsafe abortion being a major cause of maternal deaths among women in developing countries, this study attempted to explore the perception of deaf women and girls in Ghana towards safe abortion services. Objective: The main aim of this study was to understand the perception and awareness safe abortion services among deaf women and girls in Ghana. In doing this, the contributors towards unsafe abortion practices among deaf women and girls were gathered. Method: Penchansky and Thomas’ accessibility to health care theory availability, accessibility, accommodation/adequacy, affordability, and acceptability guides this study. A semi-structured interview guide based on components of the theory was used for data collection from 60 deaf persons. Results: The components of the theory were used as a priori themes that guided the data analysis. The results showed challenges associated with the indicators of health access. For instance, in terms of availability, it was revealed that deaf women had little knowledge about existing laws on safe abortion in Ghana. In relation to acceptability, deaf women were highly opposed to abortion for cultural and religious reasons. However, there was consensus that safe abortion could be conducted under certain conditions. Conclusion: The results of the study have implications for policymaking aimed at attaining equitable access to reproductive health care for deaf women. The need for policymakers to expedite public education and incorporate the needs of deaf women in reproductive health policies, as well as other study implications, are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Wisdom Kwadwo Mprah & Juventus Duorinaah & Maxwell Peprah Opoku & William Nketsia & Michael Amponteng, 2023. "Knowledge and attitudes of deaf persons towards safe abortion services in Ghana," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(4), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0281995
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281995
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0281995
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0281995&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0281995?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yao, Jing & Murray, Alan T. & Agadjanian, Victor, 2013. "A geographical perspective on access to sexual and reproductive health care for women in rural Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 60-68.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anooj Pattnaik & Diwakar Mohan & Amy Tsui & Sam Chipokosa & Hans Katengeza & Jameson Ndawala & Melissa A Marx, 2021. "The aggregate effect of implementation strength of family planning programs on modern contraceptive use at the health systems level in rural Malawi," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Yang Yu & Yijin Wu & Xin Xu & Yun Chen & Xiaobo Tian & Li Wang & Siyun Chen, 2021. "Spatial Disparities and Correlated Variables of Community Care Facility Accessibility in Rural Areas of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Neely, Abigail H. & Ponshunmugam, Arunsrinivasan, 2019. "A qualitative approach to examining health care access in rural South Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 214-221.
    4. Kathryn Grace & Nicholas N. Nagle & Clara R. Burgert‐Brucker & Shelby Rutzick & David C. Van Riper & Trinadh Dontamsetti & Trevor Croft, 2019. "Integrating Environmental Context into DHS Analysis While Protecting Participant Confidentiality: A New Remote Sensing Method," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 45(1), pages 197-218, March.
    5. Saleh Babazadeh & Philip Anglewicz & Janna M Wisniewski & Patrick K Kayembe & Julie Hernandez & Jane T Bertrand, 2020. "The influence of health facility-level access measures on modern contraceptive use in Kinshasa, DRC," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, July.
    6. Xu, Dafeng, 2024. "The wording matters: Gender equality laws and women's attitudes towards domestic violence in Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    7. Jean Digitale & Stephanie Psaki & Erica Soler-Hampejsek & Barbara S. Mensch, 2017. "Correlates of Contraceptive Use and Health Facility Choice among Young Women in Malawi," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 669(1), pages 93-124, January.
    8. Zafer Çalışkan & Dilek Kılıç & Selcen Öztürk & Emre Atılgan, 2015. "Equity in maternal health care service utilization: a systematic review for developing countries," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 60(7), pages 815-825, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0281995. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.