IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0281547.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Updating the Aesthetic Fluency Scale: Revised long and short forms for research in the psychology of the arts

Author

Listed:
  • Katherine N Cotter
  • Rebekah M Rodriguez-Boerwinkle
  • Alexander P Christensen
  • Anna Fekete
  • Jeffrey K Smith
  • Lisa F Smith
  • Pablo P L Tinio
  • Paul J Silvia

Abstract

People’s knowledge about the arts shapes how they experience and engage with art. Since its introduction, the 10-item Aesthetic Fluency Scale has been widely used to measure self-reported art knowledge. Drawing from findings and researchers’ experience since then, the present work develops and evaluates a Revised Aesthetic Fluency Scale using item response theory to broaden its scope (36 items) and refine its response scale. In a large sample (n = 2,089 English-speaking adults), Study 1 found strong evidence for unidimensionality, good item fit, and a difficulty level suitable for its targeted population; Study 2 (n = 392) provided initial evidence for score validity via relationships with art engagement, Openness to Experience, and aesthetic responsiveness; and Study 3 derived a brief, 10-item form for time-constrained projects. Taken together, the revised scales build upon lessons learned from the original and appear promising for the next generation of research.

Suggested Citation

  • Katherine N Cotter & Rebekah M Rodriguez-Boerwinkle & Alexander P Christensen & Anna Fekete & Jeffrey K Smith & Lisa F Smith & Pablo P L Tinio & Paul J Silvia, 2023. "Updating the Aesthetic Fluency Scale: Revised long and short forms for research in the psychology of the arts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(2), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0281547
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281547
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0281547
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0281547&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0281547?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Suzanne Slocum-Gori & Bruno Zumbo, 2011. "Assessing the Unidimensionality of Psychological Scales: Using Multiple Criteria from Factor Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 102(3), pages 443-461, July.
    2. Carmen Köhler & Alexander Robitzsch & Johannes Hartig, 2020. "A Bias-Corrected RMSD Item Fit Statistic: An Evaluation and Comparison to Alternatives," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 45(3), pages 251-273, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Satish Kumar & Filomena Maggino & Raj V. Mahto & Riya Sureka & Leonardo Salvatore Alaimo & Weng Marc Lim, 2022. "Social Indicators Research: A Retrospective Using Bibliometric Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 413-448, July.
    2. Sean Joo & Montserrat Valdivia & Dubravka Svetina Valdivia & Leslie Rutkowski, 2024. "Alternatives to Weighted Item Fit Statistics for Establishing Measurement Invariance in Many Groups," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 49(3), pages 465-493, June.
    3. Michael Joseph D’Italia & Adam Okulicz-Kozaryn, 2025. "Constructing General Human Agency Indicators (GHAIs) and a General Personal Agency Scale (GPAS)," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 337-411, January.
    4. Farinaz Havaei & V. Susan Dahinten, 2017. "How Well Does the CWEQ II Measure Structural Empowerment? Findings from Applying Item Response Theory," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-20, May.
    5. César Merino-Soto & Arturo Juárez-García & Guillermo Salinas Escudero & Filiberto Toledano-Toledano, 2022. "Parametric and Nonparametric Analysis of the Internal Structure of the Psychosocial Work Processes Questionnaire (PROPSIT) as Applied to Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-23, June.
    6. Moustapha Touré & Christian R. C. Kouakou & Thomas G. Poder, 2021. "Dimensions Used in Instruments for QALY Calculation: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-22, April.
    7. Nathan D. Roberson, 2022. "Multicultural Integration Policy as an Explanatory Factor of Immigrant Social Belonging: Multilevel Evidence for a Multilevel Construct," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 267-284, March.
    8. Pillai N., Vijayamohanan & A., Rjumohan, 2020. "Reliability, Validity and Uni-Dimensionality: A Primer," MPRA Paper 101714, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Scott Monroe, 2021. "Testing Latent Variable Distribution Fit in IRT Using Posterior Residuals," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(3), pages 374-398, June.
    10. Benjamin W. Domingue & Klint Kanopka & Radhika Kapoor & Steffi Pohl & R. Philip Chalmers & Charles Rahal & Mijke Rhemtulla, 2024. "The InterModel Vigorish as a Lens for Understanding (and Quantifying) the Value of Item Response Models for Dichotomously Coded Items," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 89(3), pages 1034-1054, September.
    11. Michael W. Brunt & Henrik Kreiberg & Marina A. G. von Keyserlingk, 2022. "Invertebrate research without ethical or regulatory oversight reduces public confidence and trust," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-9, December.
    12. Cristian Molla Esparza & Pablo Nájera & Emelina López-González & Josep-Maria Losilla, 2020. "Development and Validation of the Adolescent Sexting Scale (A-SextS) with a Spanish Sample," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-22, October.
    13. Ishor Sharma & M Karen Campbell & Marnin J Heisel & Yun-Hee Choi & Isaac N Luginaah & Jason Mulimba Were & Juan Camilo Vargas Gonzalez & Saverio Stranges, 2023. "Construction and validation of the area level deprivation index for health research: A methodological study based on Nepal Demographic and Health Survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(11), pages 1-10, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0281547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.