IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0280696.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Meta-evaluation of a whole systems programme, ActEarly: A study protocol

Author

Listed:
  • Liina Mansukoski
  • Bridget Lockyer
  • Amy Creaser
  • Jessica Sheringham
  • Laura Sheard
  • Philip Garnett
  • Tiffany Yang
  • Richard Cookson
  • Alexandra Albert
  • Shahid Islam
  • Robert Shore
  • Aiysha Khan
  • Simon Twite
  • Tania Dawson
  • Halima Iqbal
  • Ieva Skarda
  • Aase Villadsen
  • Miqdad Asaria
  • Jane West
  • Trevor Sheldon
  • John Wright
  • Maria Bryant

Abstract

Introduction: Living in an area with high levels of child poverty predisposes children to poorer mental and physical health. ActEarly is a 5-year research programme that comprises a large number of interventions (>20) with citizen science and co-production embedded. It aims to improve the health and well-being of children and families living in two areas of the UK with high levels of deprivation; Bradford in West Yorkshire, and the London Borough of Tower Hamlets. This protocol outlines the meta-evaluation (an evaluation of evaluations) of the ActEarly programme from a systems perspective, where individual interventions are viewed as events in the wider policy system across the two geographical areas. It includes investigating the programme’s impact on early life health and well-being outcomes, interdisciplinary prevention research collaboration and capacity building, and local and national decision making. Methods: The ActEarly meta-evaluation will follow and adapt the five iterative stages of the ‘Evaluation of Programmes in Complex Adaptive Systems’ (ENCOMPASS) framework for evaluation of public health programmes in complex adaptive systems. Theory-based and mixed-methods approaches will be used to investigate the fidelity of the ActEarly research programme, and whether, why and how ActEarly contributes to changes in the policy system, and whether alternative explanations can be ruled out. Ripple effects and systems mapping will be used to explore the relationships between interventions and their outcomes, and the degree to which the ActEarly programme encouraged interdisciplinary and prevention research collaboration as intended. A computer simulation model (“LifeSim”) will also be used to evaluate the scale of the potential long-term benefits of cross-sectoral action to tackle the financial, educational and health disadvantages faced by children in Bradford and Tower Hamlets. Together, these approaches will be used to evaluate ActEarly’s dynamic programme outputs at different system levels and measure the programme’s system changes on early life health and well-being. Discussion: This meta-evaluation protocol presents our plans for using and adapting the ENCOMPASS framework to evaluate the system-wide impact of the early life health and well-being programme, ActEarly. Due to the collaborative and non-linear nature of the work, we reserve the option to change and query some of our evaluation choices based on the feedback we receive from stakeholders to ensure that our evaluation remains relevant and fit for purpose.

Suggested Citation

  • Liina Mansukoski & Bridget Lockyer & Amy Creaser & Jessica Sheringham & Laura Sheard & Philip Garnett & Tiffany Yang & Richard Cookson & Alexandra Albert & Shahid Islam & Robert Shore & Aiysha Khan & , 2023. "Meta-evaluation of a whole systems programme, ActEarly: A study protocol," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(6), pages 1-19, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0280696
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280696
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0280696
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0280696&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0280696?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:plo:pmed00:1003368 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Patricia E Jessiman & Katie Powell & Philippa Williams & Hannah Fairbrother & Mary Crowder & Joanna G Williams & Ruth Kipping, 2021. "A systems map of the determinants of child health inequalities in England at the local level," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-25, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martínez-Jiménez, Mario & Hollingsworth, Bruce & Zucchelli, Eugenio, 2024. "Socioeconomic deprivation, health and healthcare utilisation among millennials," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    2. Hannah Fairbrother & Nicholas Woodrow & Mary Crowder & Eleanor Holding & Naomi Griffin & Vanessa Er & Caroline Dodd-Reynolds & Matt Egan & Karen Lock & Steph Scott & Carolyn Summerbell & Rachael McKeo, 2022. "‘It All Kind of Links Really’: Young People’s Perspectives on the Relationship between Socioeconomic Circumstances and Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Malpass, Alice & Le Poidevin, Andre & Bamford, Alison & Lowndes, Sally & Grant, Georgie & Selman, Lucy, 2025. "From trusted intruder to real collaborator: Mapping the ecosystem of stakeholders and community assets in a coastal region in England, with a focus on end-of-life care and bereavement support," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0280696. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.