IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0278667.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamical changes of land use/land cover and their impacts on ecological quality during China’s reform periods: A case study of Quanzhou city, China

Author

Listed:
  • Weihua Pan
  • Shuiying Wang
  • Yan Wang
  • Yongjiang Yu
  • Yanyan Luo

Abstract

The rapid growth of China’s economy has greatly accelerated the process of urbanization during China’s reform periods. Urbanization has significantly caused land use and land cover (LULC) changes and thus has impacts on the local climate and ecosystem. This study chooses Quanzhou, a fast-developing city of southeast China, as an example to detect and quantify the LULC and ecological changes from 1989 to 2018 by using the remotely sensed technique. The LULC of Quanzhou was derived from the four Landsat images taken in 1989, 1999, 2007 and 2018, and the land-use-degree ratio index and land-use–change method were used to estimate the change of land use. The remote sensing based ecological index (RSEI) was used to detect the ecological changes of the city. The built-up land expansion intensity and annual built-up land expansion rate were carried out for seven districts of Quanzhou. The results show that the urban area of Quanzhou has drastically grown by 192.99 km2 at the expense of forest, water, and cropland land during the 1989~2018 period. Moreover, the built-up land of seven districts had expanded at the average rate of 0.027~0.154 per year and the built-up expansion intensity was higher than 0.59. The average RSEI value of Quanzhou city dropped from 0.78 in 1989 to 0.34 in 2018, which suggested an overall decline in ecological quality. The proportion of areas with an RSEI rating good decreased from 30.84% to 11.52% while the proportion of areas with rating bad increased from 4.73% to 19.11% during the past 29 years. This study has shown the built-up land expansion intensity is negatively correlated with the ecological quality change, and the increase in built-up land can greatly accelerate the decline of the ecological quality. Government policies play a profound impact on land use changes, urbanization and eco-environment changes. Therefore, the policy decision-makers should take enough action and consider integrating the concept of ecology to enable the healthy and sustainable development of the city.

Suggested Citation

  • Weihua Pan & Shuiying Wang & Yan Wang & Yongjiang Yu & Yanyan Luo, 2022. "Dynamical changes of land use/land cover and their impacts on ecological quality during China’s reform periods: A case study of Quanzhou city, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(12), pages 1-27, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0278667
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278667
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0278667
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0278667&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0278667?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dahao Zhang & Chunshan Zhou & Dongqi Sun & Ying Qian, 2022. "The influence of the spatial pattern of urban road networks on the quality of business environments: the case of Dalian City," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(7), pages 9429-9446, July.
    2. Dahao Zhang & Guojun Zhang & Chunshan Zhou, 2021. "Differences in Accessibility of Public Health Facilities in Hierarchical Municipalities and the Spatial Pattern Characteristics of Their Services in Doumen District, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Stefan Siedentop & Stefan Fina, 2012. "Who Sprawls Most? Exploring the Patterns of Urban Growth across 26 European Countries," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(11), pages 2765-2784, November.
    4. Wei Chen & Jianjun Zhang & Xuelian Shi & Shidong Liu, 2020. "Impacts of Building Features on the Cooling Effect of Vegetation in Community-Based MicroClimate: Recognition, Measurement and Simulation from a Case Study of Beijing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Chunshan Zhou & Dahao Zhang & Xiong He, 2021. "Transportation Accessibility Evaluation of Educational Institutions Conducting Field Environmental Education Activities in Ecological Protection Areas: A Case Study of Zhuhai City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sheng Zhang & Shimin Xu & Da Wan & Hui Liu & Lin Zhao & Lian Guo & Juan Ren, 2023. "Equalization Measurement and Optimization of the Public Cultural Facilities Distribution in Tianjin Central Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Marcela Prokopová & Ondřej Cudlín & Renata Včeláková & Szabolcs Lengyel & Luca Salvati & Pavel Cudlín, 2018. "Latent Drivers of Landscape Transformation in Eastern Europe: Past, Present and Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Zambon, Ilaria & Serra, Pere & Grigoriadis, Efstathios & Carlucci, Margherita & Salvati, Luca, 2017. "Emerging urban centrality: An entropy-based indicator of polycentric development and economic growth," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 365-371.
    4. D. Cornille & P. Stinglhamber & L. Van Meensel, 2017. "Public sector efficiency in Belgium," Economic Review, National Bank of Belgium, issue i, pages 31-41, June.
    5. Luca Simone Rizzo & Filippo Smerghetto & Maria Giuseppina Lucia & Raffaela Gabriella Rizzo, 2017. "Sprawl Dynamics in Rural–Urban Territories Highly Suited for Wine Production. Mapping Urban Growth and Changing Territorial Shapes in North-East Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Silvia Beghelli & Gianni Guastella & Stefano Pareglio, 2020. "Governance fragmentation and urban spatial expansion: Evidence from Europe and the United States [Governance-Fragmentierung und urbane räumliche Expansion: Erkenntnisse aus Europa und den USA]," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 40(1), pages 13-32, April.
    7. Kai Zhao & Huahua Huang & Wanshu Wu, 2022. "Can the establishment of state-level urban agglomeration stimulate enterprise innovation?—Taking Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta as an example," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-23, August.
    8. Sofia Pagliarin, 2018. "Linking processes and patterns: Spatial planning, governance and urban sprawl in the Barcelona and Milan metropolitan regions," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(16), pages 3650-3668, December.
    9. Idt, Joel & Pellegrino, Margot, 2021. "From the ostensible objectives of public policies to the reality of changes: Local orders of densification in the urban regions of Paris and Rome," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    10. Jiansheng Wu & Tengyun Yi & Han Wang & Hongliang Wang & Jiayi Fu & Yuhao Zhao, 2022. "Evaluation of Medical Carrying Capacity for Megacities from a Traffic Analysis Zone View: A Case Study in Shenzhen, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Basso, Matteo & Vettoretto, Luciano, 2020. "Reversal sprawl. Land-use regulation, society and institutions in Proseccotown," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    12. Amponsah, Owusu & Blija, Daniel Kwame & Ayambire, Raphael Anammasiya & Takyi, Stephen Appiah & Mensah, Henry & Braimah, Imoro, 2022. "Global urban sprawl containment strategies and their implications for rapidly urbanising cities in Ghana," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    13. Zuzana Pucherová & Regina Mišovičová & Gabriel Bugár & Henrich Grežo, 2021. "Changes in Landscape Structure in the Municipalities of the Nitra District (Slovak Republic) Due to Expanding Suburbanization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-27, January.
    14. Tikoudis, Ioannis & Farrow, Katherine & Mebiame, Rose Mba & Oueslati, Walid, 2022. "Beyond average population density: Measuring sprawl with density-allocation indicators," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    15. Orsi, Francesco & Le Clec’h, Solen, 2023. "Effects of protected areas on the expansion of impervious surfaces in their vicinity: Evidence from Dutch Natura 2000," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    16. Cappelli, Federica & Guastella, Gianni & Pareglio, Stefano, 2020. "Institutional Fragmentation and Urbanisation in the EU Cities," FACTS: Firms And Cities Towards Sustainability 305212, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) > FACTS: Firms And Cities Towards Sustainability.
    17. Anastasia Soukhov & Antonio Páez & Christopher D Higgins & Moataz Mohamed, 2023. "Introducing spatial availability, a singly-constrained measure of competitive accessibility," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(1), pages 1-30, January.
    18. Mingyuan Chang & Longyang Huang & Tianlin Zhai & Jiawei Zhu & Yuanbo Ma & Ling Li & Chenchen Zhao, 2023. "A Challenge of Sustainable Urbanization: Mapping the Equity of Urban Public Facilities in Multiple Dimensions in Zhengzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, August.
    19. Yue Jiang & Wenpeng Lin, 2021. "A Comparative Analysis of Retrieval Algorithms of Land Surface Temperature from Landsat-8 Data: A Case Study of Shanghai, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Bagher Bagheri & Hossein Azadi & Ali Soltani & Frank Witlox, 2024. "Global city data analysis using SciMAT: a bibliometric review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 15403-15427, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0278667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.