IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0262895.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

E-CatBoost: An efficient machine learning framework for predicting ICU mortality using the eICU Collaborative Research Database

Author

Listed:
  • Nima Safaei
  • Babak Safaei
  • Seyedhouman Seyedekrami
  • Mojtaba Talafidaryani
  • Arezoo Masoud
  • Shaodong Wang
  • Qing Li
  • Mahdi Moqri

Abstract

Improving the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) management network and building cost-effective and well-managed healthcare systems are high priorities for healthcare units. Creating accurate and explainable mortality prediction models helps identify the most critical risk factors in the patients’ survival/death status and early detect the most in-need patients. This study proposes a highly accurate and efficient machine learning model for predicting ICU mortality status upon discharge using the information available during the first 24 hours of admission. The most important features in mortality prediction are identified, and the effects of changing each feature on the prediction are studied. We used supervised machine learning models and illness severity scoring systems to benchmark the mortality prediction. We also implemented a combination of SHAP, LIME, partial dependence, and individual conditional expectation plots to explain the predictions made by the best-performing model (CatBoost). We proposed E-CatBoost, an optimized and efficient patient mortality prediction model, which can accurately predict the patients’ discharge status using only ten input features. We used eICU-CRD v2.0 to train and validate the models; the dataset contains information on over 200,000 ICU admissions. The patients were divided into twelve disease groups, and models were fitted and tuned for each group. The models’ predictive performance was evaluated using the area under a receiver operating curve (AUROC). The AUROC scores were 0.86 [std:0.02] to 0.92 [std:0.02] for CatBoost and 0.83 [std:0.02] to 0.91 [std:0.03] for E-CatBoost models across the defined disease groups; if measured over the entire patient population, their AUROC scores were 7 to 18 and 2 to 12 percent higher than the baseline models, respectively. Based on SHAP explanations, we found age, heart rate, respiratory rate, blood urine nitrogen, and creatinine level as the most critical cross-disease features in mortality predictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Nima Safaei & Babak Safaei & Seyedhouman Seyedekrami & Mojtaba Talafidaryani & Arezoo Masoud & Shaodong Wang & Qing Li & Mahdi Moqri, 2022. "E-CatBoost: An efficient machine learning framework for predicting ICU mortality using the eICU Collaborative Research Database," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-33, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0262895
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262895
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0262895
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0262895&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0262895?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shane Nanayakkara & Sam Fogarty & Michael Tremeer & Kelvin Ross & Brent Richards & Christoph Bergmeir & Sheng Xu & Dion Stub & Karen Smith & Mark Tacey & Danny Liew & David Pilcher & David M Kaye, 2018. "Characterising risk of in-hospital mortality following cardiac arrest using machine learning: A retrospective international registry study," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Okan Arihan & Bernhard Wernly & Michael Lichtenauer & Marcus Franz & Bjoern Kabisch & Johanna Muessig & Maryna Masyuk & Alexander Lauten & Paul Christian Schulze & Uta C Hoppe & Malte Kelm & Christian, 2018. "Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) is independently associated with mortality in critically ill patients admitted to ICU," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, January.
    3. Esra Zihni & Vince Istvan Madai & Michelle Livne & Ivana Galinovic & Ahmed A Khalil & Jochen B Fiebach & Dietmar Frey, 2020. "Opening the black box of artificial intelligence for clinical decision support: A study predicting stroke outcome," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jihoon Moon & Muazzam Maqsood & Dayeong So & Sung Wook Baik & Seungmin Rho & Yunyoung Nam, 2024. "Advancing ensemble learning techniques for residential building electricity consumption forecasting: Insight from explainable artificial intelligence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-36, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Josline Adhiambo Otieno & Jenny Häggström & David Darehed & Marie Eriksson, 2024. "Developing machine learning models to predict multi-class functional outcomes and death three months after stroke in Sweden," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Chih-Chou Chiu & Chung-Min Wu & Te-Nien Chien & Ling-Jing Kao & Chengcheng Li & Chuan-Mei Chu, 2023. "Integrating Structured and Unstructured EHR Data for Predicting Mortality by Machine Learning and Latent Dirichlet Allocation Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Aaron E Kornblith & Chandan Singh & Gabriel Devlin & Newton Addo & Christian J Streck & James F Holmes & Nathan Kuppermann & Jacqueline Grupp-Phelan & Jeffrey Fineman & Atul J Butte & Bin Yu, 2022. "Predictability and stability testing to assess clinical decision instrument performance for children after blunt torso trauma," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 1(8), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Rajapaksha, Dilini & Bergmeir, Christoph & Hyndman, Rob J., 2023. "LoMEF: A framework to produce local explanations for global model time series forecasts," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1424-1447.
    5. Khishigsuren Davagdorj & Van Huy Pham & Nipon Theera-Umpon & Keun Ho Ryu, 2020. "XGBoost-Based Framework for Smoking-Induced Noncommunicable Disease Prediction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-22, September.
    6. repec:plo:pntd00:0008960 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Indy Man Kit Ho & Kai Yuen Cheong & Anthony Weldon, 2021. "Predicting student satisfaction of emergency remote learning in higher education during COVID-19 using machine learning techniques," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-27, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0262895. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.