IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1002709.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characterising risk of in-hospital mortality following cardiac arrest using machine learning: A retrospective international registry study

Author

Listed:
  • Shane Nanayakkara
  • Sam Fogarty
  • Michael Tremeer
  • Kelvin Ross
  • Brent Richards
  • Christoph Bergmeir
  • Sheng Xu
  • Dion Stub
  • Karen Smith
  • Mark Tacey
  • Danny Liew
  • David Pilcher
  • David M Kaye

Abstract

Background: Resuscitated cardiac arrest is associated with high mortality; however, the ability to estimate risk of adverse outcomes using existing illness severity scores is limited. Using in-hospital data available within the first 24 hours of admission, we aimed to develop more accurate models of risk prediction using both logistic regression (LR) and machine learning (ML) techniques, with a combination of demographic, physiologic, and biochemical information. Methods and findings: Patient-level data were extracted from the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Adult Patient Database for patients who had experienced a cardiac arrest within 24 hours prior to admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) during the period January 2006 to December 2016. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The models were trained and tested on a dataset (split 90:10) including age, lowest and highest physiologic variables during the first 24 hours, and key past medical history. LR and 5 ML approaches (gradient boosting machine [GBM], support vector classifier [SVC], random forest [RF], artificial neural network [ANN], and an ensemble) were compared to the APACHE III and Australian and New Zealand Risk of Death (ANZROD) predictions. In all, 39,566 patients from 186 ICUs were analysed. Mean (±SD) age was 61 ± 17 years; 65% were male. Overall in-hospital mortality was 45.5%. Models were evaluated in the test set. The APACHE III and ANZROD scores demonstrated good discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] = 0.80 [95% CI 0.79–0.82] and 0.81 [95% CI 0.8–0.82], respectively) and modest calibration (Brier score 0.19 for both), which was slightly improved by LR (AUROC = 0.82 [95% CI 0.81–0.83], DeLong test, p

Suggested Citation

  • Shane Nanayakkara & Sam Fogarty & Michael Tremeer & Kelvin Ross & Brent Richards & Christoph Bergmeir & Sheng Xu & Dion Stub & Karen Smith & Mark Tacey & Danny Liew & David Pilcher & David M Kaye, 2018. "Characterising risk of in-hospital mortality following cardiac arrest using machine learning: A retrospective international registry study," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1002709
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002709
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002709&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002709?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rajapaksha, Dilini & Bergmeir, Christoph & Hyndman, Rob J., 2023. "LoMEF: A framework to produce local explanations for global model time series forecasts," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1424-1447.
    2. Chih-Chou Chiu & Chung-Min Wu & Te-Nien Chien & Ling-Jing Kao & Chengcheng Li & Chuan-Mei Chu, 2023. "Integrating Structured and Unstructured EHR Data for Predicting Mortality by Machine Learning and Latent Dirichlet Allocation Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-22, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1002709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.