IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0251779.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of healthcare worker turnover in intensive care units: A micro-macro multilevel analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Oumou Salama Daouda
  • Mounia N Hocine
  • Laura Temime

Abstract

Background: High turnover among healthcare workers is an increasingly common phenomenon in hospitals worldwide, especially in intensive care units (ICUs). In addition to the serious financial consequences, this is a major concern for patient care (disrupted continuity of care, decreased quality and safety of care, increased rates of medication errors, …). Objective: The goal of this article was to understand how the ICU-level nurse turnover rate may be explained from multiple covariates at individual and ICU-level, using data from 526 French registered and auxiliary nurses (RANs). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in ICUs of Paris-area hospitals in 2013. First, we developed a small extension of a multi-level modeling method proposed in 2007 by Croon and van Veldhoven and validated its properties using a comprehensive simulation study. Second, we applied this approach to explain RAN turnover in French ICUs. Results: Based on the simulation study, the approach we proposed allows to estimate the regression coefficients with a relative bias below 7% for group-level factors and below 12% for individual-level factors. In our data, the mean observed RAN turnover rate was 0.19 per year (SD = 0.09). Based on our results, social support from colleagues and supervisors as well as long durations of experience in the profession were negatively associated with turnover. Conversely, number of children and impossibility to skip a break due to workload were significantly associated with higher rates of turnover. At ICU-level, number of beds, presence of intermediate care beds (continuous care unit) in the ICU and staff-to-patient ratio emerged as significant predictors. Conclusions: The findings of this research may help decision makers within hospitals by highlighting major determinants of turnover among RANs. In addition, the new approach proposed here could prove useful to researchers faced with similar micro-macro data.

Suggested Citation

  • Oumou Salama Daouda & Mounia N Hocine & Laura Temime, 2021. "Determinants of healthcare worker turnover in intensive care units: A micro-macro multilevel analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0251779
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251779
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0251779
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0251779&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0251779?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dana Hayward & Vicky Bungay & Angela C Wolff & Valerie MacDonald, 2016. "A qualitative study of experienced nurses' voluntary turnover: learning from their perspectives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(9-10), pages 1336-1345, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qiangzhen Jian & Xiuting Wang & Hisham Mohammad Al-Smadi & Aamer Waheed & Alina Badulescu & Sarminah Samad, 2022. "Proposing a Robust Model to Reduce Employees’ Turnover Intentions in an Ethical Leadership Framework: Empirical Evidence from the Healthcare Sector," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-20, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeonghee Hong & Misoon Kim & Eunyoung E. Suh & Sangwoon Cho & Soyoung Jang, 2021. "Comparison of Fatigue, Quality of Life, Turnover Intention, and Safety Incident Frequency between 2-Shift and 3-Shift Korean Nurses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Jeong Hye Park & Min Jung Park & Hye Young Hwang, 2019. "Intention to leave among staff nurses in small‐ and medium‐sized hospitals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1856-1867, May.
    3. Sastrawan Sastrawan & Jennifer Margaret Newton & Gulzar Malik, 2019. "Nurses’ integrity and coping strategies: An integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5-6), pages 733-744, March.
    4. Mary Van Osch & Kathy Scarborough & Sarah Crowe & Angela C. Wolff & Sheryl Reimer‐Kirkham, 2018. "Understanding the factors which promote registered nurses’ intent to stay in emergency and critical care areas," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 1209-1215, March.
    5. Xiaorong Luan & Ping Wang & Wenxiu Hou & Lili Chen & Fenglan Lou, 2017. "Job stress and burnout: A comparative study of senior and head nurses in China," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(2), pages 163-169, June.
    6. Yi-Chuan Chen & Yue-Liang Leon Guo & Wei-Shan Chin & Nai-Yun Cheng & Jiune-Jye Ho & Judith Shu-Chu Shiao, 2019. "Patient–Nurse Ratio is Related to Nurses’ Intention to Leave Their Job through Mediating Factors of Burnout and Job Dissatisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-14, November.
    7. Ya‐Ting Ke & Joel F. Stocker, 2019. "On the difficulty of finding one’s place: A qualitative study of new nurses’ processes of growth in the workplace," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4321-4331, December.
    8. Jison Ki & Jaegeum Ryu & Jihyun Baek & Iksoo Huh & Smi Choi-Kwon, 2020. "Association between Health Problems and Turnover Intention in Shift Work Nurses: Health Problem Clustering," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-12, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0251779. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.