IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0248930.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing and validating an individualized breast cancer risk prediction model for women attending breast cancer screening

Author

Listed:
  • Javier Louro
  • Marta Román
  • Margarita Posso
  • Ivonne Vázquez
  • Francina Saladié
  • Ana Rodriguez-Arana
  • M Jesús Quintana
  • Laia Domingo
  • Marisa Baré
  • Rafael Marcos-Gragera
  • María Vernet-Tomas
  • Maria Sala
  • Xavier Castells
  • on behalf of the BELE and IRIS Study Groups

Abstract

Background: Several studies have proposed personalized strategies based on women’s individual breast cancer risk to improve the effectiveness of breast cancer screening. We designed and internally validated an individualized risk prediction model for women eligible for mammography screening. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 121,969 women aged 50 to 69 years, screened at the long-standing population-based screening program in Spain between 1995 and 2015 and followed up until 2017. We used partly conditional Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and individual risks for age, family history of breast cancer, previous benign breast disease, and previous mammographic features. We internally validated our model with the expected-to-observed ratio and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: During a mean follow-up of 7.5 years, 2,058 women were diagnosed with breast cancer. All three risk factors were strongly associated with breast cancer risk, with the highest risk being found among women with family history of breast cancer (aHR: 1.67), a proliferative benign breast disease (aHR: 3.02) and previous calcifications (aHR: 2.52). The model was well calibrated overall (expected-to-observed ratio ranging from 0.99 at 2 years to 1.02 at 20 years) but slightly overestimated the risk in women with proliferative benign breast disease. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged from 58.7% to 64.7%, depending of the time horizon selected. Conclusions: We developed a risk prediction model to estimate the short- and long-term risk of breast cancer in women eligible for mammography screening using information routinely reported at screening participation. The model could help to guiding individualized screening strategies aimed at improving the risk-benefit balance of mammography screening programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Javier Louro & Marta Román & Margarita Posso & Ivonne Vázquez & Francina Saladié & Ana Rodriguez-Arana & M Jesús Quintana & Laia Domingo & Marisa Baré & Rafael Marcos-Gragera & María Vernet-Tomas & Ma, 2021. "Developing and validating an individualized breast cancer risk prediction model for women attending breast cancer screening," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-14, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0248930
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248930
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0248930
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0248930&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0248930?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yingye Zheng & Patrick J. Heagerty, 2005. "Partly Conditional Survival Models for Longitudinal Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(2), pages 379-391, June.
    2. Xuehong Zhang & Megan Rice & Shelley S Tworoger & Bernard A Rosner & A Heather Eliassen & Rulla M Tamimi & Amit D Joshi & Sara Lindstrom & Jing Qian & Graham A Colditz & Walter C Willett & Peter Kraft, 2018. "Addition of a polygenic risk score, mammographic density, and endogenous hormones to existing breast cancer risk prediction models: A nested case–control study," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marta Román & Javier Louro & Margarita Posso & Carmen Vidal & Xavier Bargalló & Ivonne Vázquez & María Jesús Quintana & Rodrigo Alcántara & Francina Saladié & Javier del Riego & Lupe Peñalva & Maria S, 2022. "Long-Term Risk of Breast Cancer after Diagnosis of Benign Breast Disease by Screening Mammography," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-11, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marlena Maziarz & Patrick Heagerty & Tianxi Cai & Yingye Zheng, 2017. "On longitudinal prediction with time-to-event outcome: Comparison of modeling options," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(1), pages 83-93, March.
    2. Jing Zhang & Jing Ning & Ruosha Li, 2023. "Evaluating Dynamic Discrimination Performance of Risk Prediction Models for Survival Outcomes," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 15(2), pages 353-371, July.
    3. Zijing Yang & Chengfeng Zhang & Yawen Hou & Zheng Chen, 2023. "Analysis of dynamic restricted mean survival time based on pseudo‐observations," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3690-3700, December.
    4. Yingye Zheng & Patrick J. Heagerty, 2007. "Prospective Accuracy for Longitudinal Markers," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(2), pages 332-341, June.
    5. Liang Li & Sheng Luo & Bo Hu & Tom Greene, 2017. "Dynamic Prediction of Renal Failure Using Longitudinal Biomarkers in a Cohort Study of Chronic Kidney Disease," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 9(2), pages 357-378, December.
    6. Xiao Song & C. Y. Wang, 2008. "Semiparametric Approaches for Joint Modeling of Longitudinal and Survival Data with Time-Varying Coefficients," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 557-566, June.
    7. Qi Gong & Douglas E. Schaubel, 2013. "Partly Conditional Estimation of the Effect of a Time-Dependent Factor in the Presence of Dependent Censoring," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(2), pages 338-347, June.
    8. Yong-Qiao He & Tong-Min Wang & Mingfang Ji & Zhi-Ming Mai & Minzhong Tang & Ruozheng Wang & Yifeng Zhou & Yuming Zheng & Ruowen Xiao & Dawei Yang & Ziyi Wu & Changmi Deng & Jiangbo Zhang & Wenqiong Xu, 2022. "A polygenic risk score for nasopharyngeal carcinoma shows potential for risk stratification and personalized screening," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Wang, Shikun & Li, Zhao & Lan, Lan & Zhao, Jieyi & Zheng, W. Jim & Li, Liang, 2022. "GPU accelerated estimation of a shared random effect joint model for dynamic prediction," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    10. R. Schoop & E. Graf & M. Schumacher, 2008. "Quantifying the Predictive Performance of Prognostic Models for Censored Survival Data with Time-Dependent Covariates," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 603-610, June.
    11. Qi Gong & Douglas E. Schaubel, 2017. "Estimating the average treatment effect on survival based on observational data and using partly conditional modeling," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(1), pages 134-144, March.
    12. Giulia Barbati & Alessio Farcomeni, 2018. "Prognostic assessment of repeatedly measured time-dependent biomarkers, with application to dilated cardiomyopathy," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 27(3), pages 545-557, August.
    13. Ruosha Li & Xuelin Huang & Jorge Cortes, 2016. "Quantile residual life regression with longitudinal biomarker measurements for dynamic prediction," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 65(5), pages 755-773, November.
    14. Yingye Zheng & Tianxi Cai & Janet L. Stanford & Ziding Feng, 2010. "Semiparametric Models of Time-Dependent Predictive Values of Prognostic Biomarkers," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 50-60, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0248930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.