IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0241512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tobacco control policies and smoking cessation treatment utilization: A moderated mediation analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Thrul
  • Kira E Riehm
  • Joanna E Cohen
  • G Caleb Alexander
  • Jon S Vernick
  • Ramin Mojtabai

Abstract

Background: Tobacco policies, including clean indoor air laws and cigarette taxes, increase smoking cessation in part by stimulating the use of cessation treatments. We explored whether the associations between tobacco policies and treatment use varies across sociodemographic groups. Methods: We used data from 62,165 U.S. adult participants in the 2003 and 2010/11 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey (TUS-CPS) who reported smoking cigarettes during the past-year. We built on prior structural equation models used to quantify the degree to which smoking cessation treatment use (prescription medications, nicotine replacement therapy, counseling/support groups, quitlines, and internet resources) mediated the association between clean indoor air laws, cigarette excise taxes, and recent smoking cessation. In the current study, we added selected moderators to each model to investigate whether associations between tobacco polices and smoking cessation treatment use varied by sex, race/ethnicity, education, income, and health insurance status. Results: Associations between clean indoor air laws and the use of prescription medication and nicotine replacement therapies varied significantly between racial/ethnic, age, and education groups in 2003. However, none of these moderation effects remained significant in 2010/11. Higher cigarette excise taxes in 2010/2011 were associated with higher odds of using counseling among older adults and higher odds of using prescription medications among younger adults. No other moderator reached statistical significance. Smoking cessation treatments did not mediate the effect of taxes on smoking cessation in 2003 and were not included in these analyses. Conclusions: Sociodemographic differences in associations between clean indoor air laws and smoking cessation treatment use have decreased from 2003 to 2010/11. In most cases, policies appear to stimulate smoking cessation treatment use similarly across varied sociodemographic groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Thrul & Kira E Riehm & Joanna E Cohen & G Caleb Alexander & Jon S Vernick & Ramin Mojtabai, 2021. "Tobacco control policies and smoking cessation treatment utilization: A moderated mediation analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0241512
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0241512
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0241512&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0241512?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Warner, Erica T. & Huguet, Nathalie & Fredericks, Michelle & Gundersen, Daniel & Nederveld, Andrea & Brown, Meagan C. & Houston, Thomas K. & Davis, Kia L. & Mazzucca, Stephanie & Rendle, Katharine A. , 2023. "Advancing health equity through implementation science: Identifying and examining measures of the outer setting," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0241512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.