IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0237732.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and validation of the Harm Concept Breadth Scale: Assessing individual differences in harm inflation

Author

Listed:
  • Melanie J McGrath
  • Nick Haslam

Abstract

Three studies (Ns = 350, 301 & 341) examined the reliability, validity, and correlates of a new measure of harm inflation, the individual differences counterpart of ‘concept creep’. The Harm Concept Breadth Scale (HCBS) assesses variability in the expansiveness of concepts of harm (i.e., bullying, mental disorder, prejudice, trauma), such that these concepts refer to a wider range of phenomena among people scoring high on the scale. Study 1 developed 66 vignettes representing potential instances of the four concepts, selected optimal subsets of 10 vignettes for each concept, and demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency of the subscales. Study 2 demonstrated that the HCBS had excellent internal consistency, and established construct validity through associations with measures of moral foundations, justice sensitivity, general category inclusiveness, and political orientation. Study 3 employed participants from a different national background and further clarified the correlates of the HCBS via measures of empathy, moral expansiveness, and the Big Five personality traits. The findings indicate that concept breadth is a reliably measurable individual difference variable with weak to moderate associations with harm-based morality, prosocial concern, political liberalism, female gender, and negative emotionality. The HCBS is a valid psychometric instrument for examining the causes and implications of harm inflation.

Suggested Citation

  • Melanie J McGrath & Nick Haslam, 2020. "Development and validation of the Harm Concept Breadth Scale: Assessing individual differences in harm inflation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0237732
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0237732
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0237732&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0237732?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kvaale, Erlend P. & Gottdiener, William H. & Haslam, Nick, 2013. "Biogenetic explanations and stigma: A meta-analytic review of associations among laypeople," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 95-103.
    2. Melissa A Wheeler & Melanie J McGrath & Nick Haslam, 2019. "Twentieth century morality: The rise and fall of moral concepts from 1900 to 2007," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-12, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei Liu, 2019. "Recognition of, and beliefs about, causes of mental disorders: A cross‐sectional study of US and Chinese undergraduate nursing students," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(1), pages 28-36, March.
    2. Joseph M. Stubbersfield & Lewis G. Dean & Sana Sheikh & Kevin N. Laland & Catharine P. Cross, 2019. "Social transmission favours the ‘morally good’ over the ‘merely arousing’," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Lorenza Magliano & Antonella Strino & Rosanna Punzo & Roberta Acone & Gaetana Affuso & John Read, 2017. "Effects of the diagnostic label ‘schizophrenia’, actively used or passively accepted, on general practitioners’ views of this disorder," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 63(3), pages 224-234, May.
    4. Jan-Hinrich Meyer & Ko Ruyter & Dhruv Grewal & Kathleen Cleeren & Debbie Isobel Keeling & Scott Motyka, 2020. "Categorical versus dimensional thinking: improving anti-stigma campaigns by matching health message frames and implicit worldviews," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 222-245, March.
    5. Alexandra Maftei & Alois Ghergut, 2021. "Spontaneous Representations of Disability and Attitudes toward Inclusive Educational Practices: a Mixed Approach," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 12(2), pages 18-39, July.
    6. Hatsumi Yoshii & Nobutaka Kitamura, 2018. "Program for Promoting the Employment of Schizophrenic Patients in Japan," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(5), pages 1-70, May.
    7. David Dann & Raphael Müller & Ann-Catherin Werner & Timm Teubner & Alexander Mädche & Christoph Spengel, 2022. "How do tax compliance labels impact sharing platform consumers? An empirical study on the interplay of trust, moral, and intention to book," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 409-439, September.
    8. Lisa Colman & Katrijn Delaruelle & Carolien Luypaert & Rebekka Verniest & Piet Bracke, 2021. "Burdens in mental health recovery: Causal beliefs and their relation to stigma and help seeking recommendations," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 67(8), pages 992-1004, December.
    9. Priscillia Averous & Elodie Charbonnier & Marie-Claude Lagouanelle-Simeoni & Lionel Dany, 2018. "Illness representations about schizophrenia and bipolar disorder held by French people without a mental disorder," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 64(8), pages 813-820, December.
    10. Wang, Tse-Min, 2021. "Voluntary contributions to public goods : A multi-disciplinary examination of prosocial behavior and its antecedents," Other publications TiSEM f0f6341f-5530-4d18-99e3-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0237732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.