IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0235064.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the impact of social determinants of health on predictive models for potentially avoidable 30-day readmission or death

Author

Listed:
  • Yongkang Zhang
  • Yiye Zhang
  • Evan Sholle
  • Sajjad Abedian
  • Marianne Sharko
  • Meghan Reading Turchioe
  • Yiyuan Wu
  • Jessica S Ancker

Abstract

Objectives: Early hospital readmissions or deaths are key healthcare quality measures in pay-for-performance programs. Predictive models could identify patients at higher risk of readmission or death and target interventions. However, existing models usually do not incorporate social determinants of health (SDH) information, although this information is of great importance to address health disparities related to social risk factors. The objective of this study is to examine the impact of social determinants of health on predictive models for potentially avoidable 30-day readmission. Methods: We extracted electronic health record data for 19,941 hospital admissions between January 2015 and November 2017 at an academic medical center in New York City. We applied the Simplified HOSPITAL score model to predict potentially avoidable 30-day readmission or death and examined if incorporating individual- and community-level SDH could improve the prediction using cross-validation. We calculated the C-statistic for discrimination, Brier score for accuracy, and Hosmer–Lemeshow test for calibration for each model using logistic regression. Analysis was conducted for all patients and three subgroups that may be disproportionately affected by social risk factors, namely Medicaid patients, patients who are 65 or older, and obese patients. Results: The Simplified HOSPITAL score model achieved similar performance in our sample compared to previous studies. Adding SDH did not improve the prediction among all patients. However, adding individual- and community-level SDH at the US census tract level significantly improved the prediction for all three subgroups. Specifically, C-statistics improved from 0.70 to 0.73 for Medicaid patients, from 0.66 to 0.68 for patients 65 or older, and from 0.70 to 0.73 for obese patients. Conclusions: Patients from certain subgroups may be more likely to be affected by social risk factors. Incorporating SDH into predictive models may be helpful to identify these patients and reduce health disparities associated with vulnerable social conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongkang Zhang & Yiye Zhang & Evan Sholle & Sajjad Abedian & Marianne Sharko & Meghan Reading Turchioe & Yiyuan Wu & Jessica S Ancker, 2020. "Assessing the impact of social determinants of health on predictive models for potentially avoidable 30-day readmission or death," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0235064
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0235064
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0235064&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0235064?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:mpr:mprres:6970 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Goetschius, Leigh G. & Henderson, Morgan & Han, Fei & Mahmoudi, Dillon & Perman, Chad & Haft, Howard & Stockwell, Ian, 2023. "Assessing performance of ZCTA-level and Census Tract-level social and environmental risk factors in a model predicting hospital events," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0235064. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.