IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0231374.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sex differences in fracture outcomes within Taiwan population: A nationwide matched study

Author

Listed:
  • Fang-Pai Chou
  • Hung-Chi Chang
  • Chun-Chieh Yeh
  • Chih-Hsing Wu
  • Yih-Giun Cherng
  • Ta-Liang Chen
  • Chien-Chang Liao

Abstract

Background and aims: Because the sex difference in outcomes of fracture was incompletely understood, we evaluated the post-fracture complications and mortality of female and male patients. Methods: We conducted a nationwide study of 498,586 fracture patients who received inpatient care using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database 2008–2013 claims data. Female and male fracture patients were selected for comparison by using a propensity-score matching procedure. Age, low income, types of fracture, fracture with surgery, several medical conditions, number of hospitalization and emergency visits were considered as potential confounding factors. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (OR), the 95% CI of post-fracture complications and 30-day in-hospital mortality differences between women and men. Results: Male patients had a higher risk of post-fracture pneumonia (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.83–2.11), acute renal failure (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.60–2.15), deep wound infection (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.51–1.77), stroke (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.49–1.67), septicemia (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.42–1.61), acute myocardial infarction (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.09–1.75) and 30-day in-hospital mortality (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.48–1.93) compared with female patients. However, a lower risk of post-fracture urinary tract infection (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.65–0.72) was found in men than in women. Male patients also had longer hospital stays and higher medical expenditures due to fracture admission than did the female patients. Higher rates of post-fracture adverse events in male patients were noted in all age groups and all types of fractures. Conclusion: We raised the possibility that male patients showed more complications and higher mortality rates after fracture admission compared with female patients, with the exception of urinary tract infections.

Suggested Citation

  • Fang-Pai Chou & Hung-Chi Chang & Chun-Chieh Yeh & Chih-Hsing Wu & Yih-Giun Cherng & Ta-Liang Chen & Chien-Chang Liao, 2020. "Sex differences in fracture outcomes within Taiwan population: A nationwide matched study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0231374
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231374
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231374&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0231374?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jacobsen, S.J. & Goldberg, J. & Miles, T.P. & Brody, J.A. & Stiers, W. & Rimm, A.A., 1992. "Race and sex differences in mortality following fracture of the hip," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 82(8), pages 1147-1150.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0231374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.