IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0227285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative PCR provides a simple and accessible method for quantitative microbiota profiling

Author

Listed:
  • Ching Jian
  • Panu Luukkonen
  • Hannele Yki-Järvinen
  • Anne Salonen
  • Katri Korpela

Abstract

The use of relative abundance data from next generation sequencing (NGS) can lead to misinterpretations of microbial community structures, as the increase of one taxon leads to the concurrent decrease of the other(s) in compositional data. Although different DNA- and cell-based methods as well as statistical approaches have been developed to overcome the compositionality problem, and the biological relevance of absolute bacterial abundances has been demonstrated, the human microbiome research has not yet adopted these methods, likely due to feasibility issues. Here, we describe how quantitative PCR (qPCR) done in parallel to NGS library preparation provides an accurate estimation of absolute taxon abundances from NGS data and hence provides an attainable solution to compositionality in high-throughput microbiome analyses. The advantages and potential challenges of the method are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ching Jian & Panu Luukkonen & Hannele Yki-Järvinen & Anne Salonen & Katri Korpela, 2020. "Quantitative PCR provides a simple and accessible method for quantitative microbiota profiling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0227285
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227285
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227285&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0227285?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James T. Morton & Clarisse Marotz & Alex Washburne & Justin Silverman & Livia S. Zaramela & Anna Edlund & Karsten Zengler & Rob Knight, 2019. "Establishing microbial composition measurement standards with reference frames," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carla L. Abán & Giovanni Larama & Antonella Ducci & Jorgelina Huidobro & Michel Abanto & Silvina Vargas-Gil & Carolina Pérez-Brandan, 2022. "Soil Properties and Bacterial Communities Associated with the Rhizosphere of the Common Bean after Using Brachiaria brizantha as a Service Crop: A 10-Year Field Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Koen Wortelboer & Patrick A. Jonge & Torsten P. M. Scheithauer & Ilias Attaye & E. Marleen Kemper & Max Nieuwdorp & Hilde Herrema, 2023. "Phage-microbe dynamics after sterile faecal filtrate transplantation in individuals with metabolic syndrome: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial assessing efficacy and safety," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Brian D. Williamson & James P. Hughes & Amy D. Willis, 2022. "A multiview model for relative and absolute microbial abundances," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 1181-1194, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Srinivasan, Arun & Xue, Lingzhou & Zhan, Xiang, 2023. "Identification of microbial features in multivariate regression under false discovery rate control," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    2. Woojin Choi & Utkarsh Mangal & Jin-Young Park & Ji-Yeong Kim & Taesuk Jun & Ju Won Jung & Moonhyun Choi & Sungwon Jung & Milae Lee & Ji-Yeong Na & Du Yeol Ryu & Jin Man Kim & Jae-Sung Kwon & Won-Gun K, 2023. "Occlusive membranes for guided regeneration of inflamed tissue defects," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Julien Tap & Franck Lejzerowicz & Aurélie Cotillard & Matthieu Pichaud & Daniel McDonald & Se Jin Song & Rob Knight & Patrick Veiga & Muriel Derrien, 2023. "Global branches and local states of the human gut microbiome define associations with environmental and intrinsic factors," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Huang Lin & Merete Eggesbø & Shyamal Das Peddada, 2022. "Linear and nonlinear correlation estimators unveil undescribed taxa interactions in microbiome data," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Jeremiah J. Minich & Andreas Härer & Joseph Vechinski & Benjamin W. Frable & Zachary R. Skelton & Emily Kunselman & Michael A. Shane & Daniela S. Perry & Antonio Gonzalez & Daniel McDonald & Rob Knigh, 2022. "Host biology, ecology and the environment influence microbial biomass and diversity in 101 marine fish species," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Shulei Wang, 2023. "Robust differential abundance test in compositional data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 110(1), pages 169-185.
    7. Brian D. Williamson & James P. Hughes & Amy D. Willis, 2022. "A multiview model for relative and absolute microbial abundances," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 1181-1194, September.
    8. J. Liu & Xinlian Zhang & T. Chen & T. Wu & T. Lin & L. Jiang & S. Lang & L. Liu & L. Natarajan & J.X. Tu & T. Kosciolek & J. Morton & T.T. Nguyen & B. Schnabl & R. Knight & C. Feng & Y. Zhong & X.M. T, 2022. "A semiparametric model for between‐subject attributes: Applications to beta‐diversity of microbiome data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 950-962, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0227285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.