IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0217931.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived publication pressure in Amsterdam: Survey of all disciplinary fields and academic ranks

Author

Listed:
  • Tamarinde L Haven
  • Lex M Bouter
  • Yvo M Smulders
  • Joeri K Tijdink

Abstract

Publications determine to a large extent the possibility to stay in academia (“publish or perish”). While some pressure to publish may incentivise high quality research, too much publication pressure is likely to have detrimental effects on both the scientific enterprise and on individual researchers. Our research question was: What is the level of perceived publication pressure in the four academic institutions in Amsterdam and does the pressure to publish differ between academic ranks and disciplinary fields? Investigating researchers in Amsterdam with the revised Publication Pressure Questionnaire, we find that a negative attitude towards the current publication climate is present across academic ranks and disciplinary fields. Postdocs and assistant professors (M = 3.42) perceive the greatest publication stress and PhD-students (M = 2.44) perceive a significant lack of resources to relieve publication stress. Results indicate the need for a healthier publication climate where the quality and integrity of research is rewarded.

Suggested Citation

  • Tamarinde L Haven & Lex M Bouter & Yvo M Smulders & Joeri K Tijdink, 2019. "Perceived publication pressure in Amsterdam: Survey of all disciplinary fields and academic ranks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-12, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0217931
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217931
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0217931
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0217931&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0217931?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joeri K Tijdink & Anton C M Vergouwen & Yvo M Smulders, 2013. "Publication Pressure and Burn Out among Dutch Medical Professors: A Nationwide Survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-6, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julia Heuritsch, 2021. "Reflexive Behaviour: How Publication Pressure Affects Research Quality in Astronomy," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Halizah Mat Rifin & Mahmoud Danaee, 2022. "Association between Burnout, Job Dissatisfaction and Intention to Leave among Medical Researchers in a Research Organisation in Malaysia during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Cristina Sestili & Stefania Scalingi & Sara Cianfanelli & Alice Mannocci & Angela Del Cimmuto & Simone De Sio & Massimiliano Chiarini & Marco Di Muzio & Paolo Villari & Maria De Giusti & Giuseppe La T, 2018. "Reliability and Use of Copenhagen Burnout Inventory in Italian Sample of University Professors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-11, August.
    4. Daniele Fanelli & Vincent Larivière, 2016. "Researchers’ Individual Publication Rate Has Not Increased in a Century," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, March.
    5. van Dalen, Hendrik Peter, 2018. "Invisible barriers to the top for female economists," Other publications TiSEM 86a9c814-6feb-4056-b7dd-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0217931. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.