IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0205145.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of prolonged exposure to feedback delay on the qualitative subjective experience of virtual reality

Author

Listed:
  • Loes C J van Dam
  • Josie R Stephens

Abstract

When interacting with virtual environments, feedback delays between making a movement and seeing the visual consequences of that movement are detrimental for the subjective quality of the VR experience. Here we used standard measures of subjective experiences such as ownership, agency and presence to investigate whether prolonged exposure to the delay, and thus the possibility to adapt to it, leads to the recovery of the qualitative experience of VR. Participants performed a target-tracking task in a Virtual Reality environment. We measured the participants’ tracking performance in terms of spatial and temporal errors with respect to the target in both No-Delay and Delay conditions. Additionally, participants rated their sense of “ownership” of holding a virtual tool, agency and presence on each trial using sliding scales. These single trial ratings were compared to the results of the more traditional questionnaires for ownership and agency and presence for both No-Delay and Delay conditions. We found that the participants’ sliding scales ratings corresponded very well to the scores obtained from the traditional questionnaires. Moreover, not only did participants behaviourally adapt to the delay, their ratings of ownership and agency significantly improved with prolonged exposure to the delay. Together the results suggest a tight link between the ability to perform a behavioural task and the subjective ratings of ownership and agency in virtual reality.

Suggested Citation

  • Loes C J van Dam & Josie R Stephens, 2018. "Effects of prolonged exposure to feedback delay on the qualitative subjective experience of virtual reality," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0205145
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0205145
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0205145&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0205145?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Loes C J van Dam & Marc O Ernst, 2015. "Mapping Shape to Visuomotor Mapping: Learning and Generalisation of Sensorimotor Behaviour Based on Contextual Information," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Sotaro Shimada & Kensuke Fukuda & Kazuo Hiraki, 2009. "Rubber Hand Illusion under Delayed Visual Feedback," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(7), pages 1-5, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seito Matsubara & Sohei Wakisaka & Kazuma Aoyama & Katie Seaborn & Atsushi Hiyama & Masahiko Inami, 2020. "Perceptual simultaneity and its modulation during EMG-triggered motion induction with electrical muscle stimulation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Sophie Smit & Anina N Rich & Regine Zopf, 2019. "Visual body form and orientation cues do not modulate visuo-tactile temporal integration," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, December.
    3. H. Henrik Ehrsson & Aikaterini Fotopoulou & Dominika Radziun & Matthew R. Longo & Manos Tsakiris, 2022. "No specific relationship between hypnotic suggestibility and the rubber hand illusion," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-3, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0205145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.