IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0006185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rubber Hand Illusion under Delayed Visual Feedback

Author

Listed:
  • Sotaro Shimada
  • Kensuke Fukuda
  • Kazuo Hiraki

Abstract

Background: Rubber hand illusion (RHI) is a subject's illusion of the self-ownership of a rubber hand that was touched synchronously with their own hand. Although previous studies have confirmed that this illusion disappears when the rubber hand was touched asynchronously with the subject's hand, the minimum temporal discrepancy of these two events for attenuation of RHI has not been examined. Methodology/Principal Findings: In this study, various temporal discrepancies between visual and tactile stimulations were introduced by using a visual feedback delay experimental setup, and RHI effects in each temporal discrepancy condition were systematically tested. The results showed that subjects felt significantly greater RHI effects with temporal discrepancies of less than 300 ms compared with longer temporal discrepancies. The RHI effects on reaching performance (proprioceptive drift) showed similar conditional differences. Conclusions/Significance: Our results first demonstrated that a temporal discrepancy of less than 300 ms between visual stimulation of the rubber hand and tactile stimulation to the subject's own hand is preferable to induce strong sensation of RHI. We suggest that the time window of less than 300 ms is critical for multi-sensory integration processes constituting the self-body image.

Suggested Citation

  • Sotaro Shimada & Kensuke Fukuda & Kazuo Hiraki, 2009. "Rubber Hand Illusion under Delayed Visual Feedback," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(7), pages 1-5, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0006185
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0006185
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0006185&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0006185?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jing Zhang & Xianjie Ping & Wei Chen & Da Dong, 2024. "Beyond substantiality and illusion: the problem of the self in Buddhist constructivism," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Sophie Smit & Anina N Rich & Regine Zopf, 2019. "Visual body form and orientation cues do not modulate visuo-tactile temporal integration," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, December.
    3. H. Henrik Ehrsson & Aikaterini Fotopoulou & Dominika Radziun & Matthew R. Longo & Manos Tsakiris, 2022. "No specific relationship between hypnotic suggestibility and the rubber hand illusion," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-3, December.
    4. Loes C J van Dam & Josie R Stephens, 2018. "Effects of prolonged exposure to feedback delay on the qualitative subjective experience of virtual reality," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Seito Matsubara & Sohei Wakisaka & Kazuma Aoyama & Katie Seaborn & Atsushi Hiyama & Masahiko Inami, 2020. "Perceptual simultaneity and its modulation during EMG-triggered motion induction with electrical muscle stimulation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0006185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.