IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0192552.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The 3-min all-out test is valid for determining critical power but not anaerobic work capacity in tethered running

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Carolina Traina Gama
  • Ivan Gustavo Masselli dos Reis
  • Filipe Antônio de Barros Sousa
  • Claudio Alexandre Gobatto

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate if the 3-min all-out test (3MT) is valid for obtaining critical power intensity (CP) and the amount of work that can be performed above CP (W’) on non-motorized treadmills in tethered running. Eight physically active individuals (24 ± 3 years; 78.3 ± 8.7 kg; 179 ± 5 cm; 9.0 ± 2.5% body fat) performed four different efforts at constant intensity to exhaustion in order to determine CP and W’. The mechanical power values obtained were subsequently plotted with their corresponding time to exhaustion (limit time) for application of three mathematical models: power hyperbolic versus time limit (Hyp), linear power versus 1/time (P vs 1/t) and linear work versus time limit (Ԏ vs t). The 3MT test was carried out on the last day to determine end power (EP) and anaerobic capacity (WEP) using this methodology. EP value of 181.7 ± 52 was similar (p = 0.486) to 178.2 ± 61 (CP Hyp), 191.4 ± 55 (Ԏ vs t) and 188.3 ± 55 (P vs 1/t). WEP value of 17.9 ± 4.8 was not similar (p = 0.000) to 50.2 ± 15.3 (CP Hyp), 44.8 ± 8.7 (Ԏ vs t) and 45.5 ± 8.4 (P vs 1/t). Positive results (r = 0.78–0.98 and ICC = 0.88–0.99) of Pearson correlation and intraclass correlation (ICC–absolute agreement) were found for aerobic applications of conventional CP and 3MT. For anaerobic data, only the three models of conventional CP were correlated (r = 0.76–0.93); however, W’ from the three models was not correlated with WEP (r = 0.37–0.52). The results of this study suggest that 3MT in tethered running on non-motorized treadmills is a valid test for estimating CP aerobic parameters in a single day of application but not anaerobic parameters of W’.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Carolina Traina Gama & Ivan Gustavo Masselli dos Reis & Filipe Antônio de Barros Sousa & Claudio Alexandre Gobatto, 2018. "The 3-min all-out test is valid for determining critical power but not anaerobic work capacity in tethered running," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0192552
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0192552
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0192552&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0192552?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alessandro Moura Zagatto & Willian Eiji Miyagi & Filipe Antônio de Barros Sousa & Claudio Alexandre Gobatto, 2017. "Relationship between anaerobic capacity estimated using a single effort and 30-s tethered running outcomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Filipe Antônio Barros Sousa & Rubens Eduardo Vasque & Claudio Alexandre Gobatto, 2017. "Anaerobic metabolism during short all-out efforts in tethered running: Comparison of energy expenditure and mechanical parameters between different sprint durations for testing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-11, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0192552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.