IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0172032.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship between anaerobic capacity estimated using a single effort and 30-s tethered running outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandro Moura Zagatto
  • Willian Eiji Miyagi
  • Filipe Antônio de Barros Sousa
  • Claudio Alexandre Gobatto

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to investigate the relationship between alternative anaerobic capacity method (MAODALT) and a 30-s all-out tethered running test. Fourteen male recreational endurance runners underwent a graded exercise test, a supramaximal exhaustive effort and a 30-s all-out test on different days, interspaced by 48h. After verification of data normality (Shapiro-Wilk test), the Pearson’s correlation test was used to verify the association between the anaerobic estimates from the MAODALT and the 30-s all-out tethered running outputs. Absolute MAODALT was correlated with mean power (r = 0.58; P = 0.03), total work (r = 0.57; P = 0.03), and mean force (r = 0.79; P = 0.001). In addition, energy from the glycolytic pathway (E[La-]) was correlated with mean power (r = 0.58; P = 0.03). Significant correlations were also found at each 5s interval between absolute MAODALT and force values (r between 0.75 and 0.84), and between force values and E[La-] (r between 0.73 to 0.80). In conclusion, the associations between absolute MAODALT and the mechanical outputs from the 30-s all-out tethered running test evidenced the importance of the anaerobic capacity for maintaining force during the course of time in short efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandro Moura Zagatto & Willian Eiji Miyagi & Filipe Antônio de Barros Sousa & Claudio Alexandre Gobatto, 2017. "Relationship between anaerobic capacity estimated using a single effort and 30-s tethered running outcomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0172032
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0172032
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0172032&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Filipe Antônio Barros Sousa & Rubens Eduardo Vasque & Claudio Alexandre Gobatto, 2017. "Anaerobic metabolism during short all-out efforts in tethered running: Comparison of energy expenditure and mechanical parameters between different sprint durations for testing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-11, June.
    2. Maria Carolina Traina Gama & Ivan Gustavo Masselli dos Reis & Filipe Antônio de Barros Sousa & Claudio Alexandre Gobatto, 2018. "The 3-min all-out test is valid for determining critical power but not anaerobic work capacity in tethered running," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0172032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.