IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0187400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employing open/hidden administration in psychotherapy research: A randomized-controlled trial of expressive writing

Author

Listed:
  • Theresa Tondorf
  • Lisa-Katrin Kaufmann
  • Alexander Degel
  • Cosima Locher
  • Johanna Birkhäuer
  • Heike Gerger
  • Ulrike Ehlert
  • Jens Gaab

Abstract

Psychotherapy has been shown to be effective, but efforts to prove specific effects by placebo-controlled trials have been practically and conceptually hampered. We propose that adopting open/hidden designs from placebo research would offer a possible way to establish specificity in psychotherapy. Therefore, we tested the effects of providing opposing treatment rationales in an online expressive writing intervention on affect in healthy subjects. Results indicate that it was possible to conduct the expressive writing intervention both covertly and openly, but that participants in the hidden administration condition did not fully benefit from the otherwise effective expressive writing intervention in the long-run. Effect sizes between open and hidden administration groups were comparable to pre-post effect sizes of the intervention. While this finding is important for the understanding of psychotherapy's effects per se, it also proves that alternative research approaches to establish specificity are feasible and informative in psychotherapy research.Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00009428

Suggested Citation

  • Theresa Tondorf & Lisa-Katrin Kaufmann & Alexander Degel & Cosima Locher & Johanna Birkhäuer & Heike Gerger & Ulrike Ehlert & Jens Gaab, 2017. "Employing open/hidden administration in psychotherapy research: A randomized-controlled trial of expressive writing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0187400
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0187400
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0187400&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0187400?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karen Lund & Lene Vase & Gitte L Petersen & Troels S Jensen & Nanna B Finnerup, 2014. "Randomised Controlled Trials May Underestimate Drug Effects: Balanced Placebo Trial Design," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valente, Christine & Sievertsen, Hans Henrik & Puri, Mahesh C., 2020. "Saving Neonatal Lives for a Quarter," IZA Discussion Papers 13719, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0187400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.