IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0185456.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association between matrix metalloproteinases polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Xu-Ming Zhu
  • Wei-Feng Sun

Abstract

Background: Published data on the relationship between matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk have implicated inconclusive results. To evaluate the role of MMPs polymorphisms in ovarian cancer risk, a meta-analysis and systematic review were performed. Methods: MMPs polymorphisms which could be quantitatively synthesized were involved in meta-analysis. Five comparison models (homozygote model, heterozygote model, dominant model, recessive model, additive model) were carried out, a subgroup analysis was performed to clarify heterogeneity source. The remaining polymorphisms which could not be quantitatively synthesized were involved in systematic review. Results: 10 articles with 20 studies were included in this paper. Among those studies, 8 studies involving MMP1 rs1799750 and MMP3 rs34093618 could be meta-analyzed and 12 studies involving 12 polymorphisms could not. Meta-analysis showed that no associations were found between MMP1 rs1799750 (homozygote model: OR = 0.93, 95%CI = 0.70–1.23, POR = 0.60; heterozygote model: OR = 1.09, 95%CI = 0.78–1.54, POR = 0.61; dominant model: OR = 1.02, 95%CI = 0.83–1.25, POR = 0.84; recessive model: OR = 0.95, 95%CI = 0.75–1.21, POR = 0.67; additive model: OR = 1.00, 95%CI = 0.85–1.17, POR = 0.99), MMP3 rs34093618 (homozygote model: OR = 1.25, 95%CI = 0.70–2.24, POR = 0.46; heterozygote model: OR = 1.08, 95%CI = 0.51–2.31, POR = 0.84; dominant model: OR = 0.97, 95%CI = 0.68–1.38, POR = 0.85; recessive model: OR = 1.12, 95%CI = 0.69–1.80, POR = 0.65; additive model: OR = 1.01, 95%CI = 0.79–1.31, POR = 0.91) and ovarian cancer. Furthermore, similar results were detected in subgroup analysis. The systematic review on 12 polymorphisms suggested that MMP2 C-735T, MMP7 A-181G, MMP8 rs11225395, MMP9 rs6094237, MMP12 rs2276109, MMP20 rs2292730, MMP20 rs12278250, MMP20 rs9787933 might have a potential effect on ovarian cancer risk. Conclusions: In summary, polymorphisms of MMPs might not be associated with ovarian cancer risk. However, it is necessary to conduct more larger-scale, multicenter, and high-quality studies in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu-Ming Zhu & Wei-Feng Sun, 2017. "Association between matrix metalloproteinases polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk: A meta-analysis and systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0185456
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0185456
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0185456&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0185456?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peiliang Geng & Jianjun Li & Ning Wang & Juanjuan Ou & Ganfeng Xie & Chen Liu & Xiaoxin Zhao & Lisha Xiang & Yunmei Liao & Houjie Liang, 2015. "PSCA rs2294008 Polymorphism with Increased Risk of Cancer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-12, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0185456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.