IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0176635.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting herbivore faecal nitrogen using a multispecies near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy calibration

Author

Listed:
  • Miriam Villamuelas
  • Emmanuel Serrano
  • Johan Espunyes
  • Néstor Fernández
  • Jorge R López-Olvera
  • Mathieu Garel
  • João Santos
  • María Ángeles Parra-Aguado
  • Maurizio Ramanzin
  • Xavier Fernández-Aguilar
  • Andreu Colom-Cadena
  • Ignasi Marco
  • Santiago Lavín
  • Jordi Bartolomé
  • Elena Albanell

Abstract

Optimal management of free-ranging herbivores requires the accurate assessment of an animal’s nutritional status. For this purpose ‘near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy’ (NIRS) is very useful, especially when nutritional assessment is done through faecal indicators such as faecal nitrogen (FN). In order to perform an NIRS calibration, the default protocol recommends starting by generating an initial equation based on at least 50–75 samples from the given species. Although this protocol optimises prediction accuracy, it limits the use of NIRS with rare or endangered species where sample sizes are often small. To overcome this limitation we tested a single NIRS equation (i.e., multispecies calibration) to predict FN in herbivores. Firstly, we used five herbivore species with highly contrasting digestive physiologies to build monospecies and multispecies calibrations, namely horse, sheep, Pyrenean chamois, red deer and European rabbit. Secondly, the equation accuracy was evaluated by two procedures using: (1) an external validation with samples from the same species, which were not used in the calibration process; and (2) samples from different ungulate species, specifically Alpine ibex, domestic goat, European mouflon, roe deer and cattle. The multispecies equation was highly accurate in terms of the coefficient of determination for calibration R2 = 0.98, standard error of validation SECV = 0.10, standard error of external validation SEP = 0.12, ratio of performance to deviation RPD = 5.3, and range error of prediction RER = 28.4. The accuracy of the multispecies equation to predict other herbivore species was also satisfactory (R2 > 0.86, SEP 2.6, and RER > 8.1). Lastly, the agreement between multi- and monospecies calibrations was also confirmed by the Bland-Altman method. In conclusion, our single multispecies equation can be used as a reliable, cost-effective, easy and powerful analytical method to assess FN in a wide range of herbivore species.

Suggested Citation

  • Miriam Villamuelas & Emmanuel Serrano & Johan Espunyes & Néstor Fernández & Jorge R López-Olvera & Mathieu Garel & João Santos & María Ángeles Parra-Aguado & Maurizio Ramanzin & Xavier Fernández-Aguil, 2017. "Predicting herbivore faecal nitrogen using a multispecies near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy calibration," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0176635
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0176635
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0176635&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0176635?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0176635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.