IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0173353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two studies in one: A propensity-score-matched comparison of fingolimod versus interferons and glatiramer acetate using real-world data from the independent German studies, PANGAEA and PEARL

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Alsop
  • Jennie Medin
  • Christian Cornelissen
  • Stefan Viktor Vormfelde
  • Tjalf Ziemssen

Abstract

Background: This study compared outcomes following fingolimod or BRACE treatments (beta-interferons/glatiramer acetate) in patients with active MS (≥ 1 relapse in the previous year) following previous BRACE treatment. Methods and findings: Patients with active MS who previously received BRACE were identified from German prospective, observational studies, PANGAEA and PEARL. A novel methodology was developed to compare outcomes between propensity-score-matched cohorts (3:1 ratio) from the independent single-arm studies. Patients in PANGAEA (n = 1287) experienced 48% fewer relapses per year than those in PEARL (n = 429; annualized relapse rate ratio: 0.52; p

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Alsop & Jennie Medin & Christian Cornelissen & Stefan Viktor Vormfelde & Tjalf Ziemssen, 2017. "Two studies in one: A propensity-score-matched comparison of fingolimod versus interferons and glatiramer acetate using real-world data from the independent German studies, PANGAEA and PEARL," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0173353
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173353
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0173353
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0173353&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0173353?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gisela Kobelt & Jenny Berg & Peter Lindgren & W. Elias & P. Flachenecker & M. Freidel & N. König & V. Limmroth & E. Straube, 2006. "Costs and quality of life of multiple sclerosis in Germany," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 7(2), pages 34-44, July.
    2. Gisela Kobelt & Jenny Berg & Peter Lindgren & W. Elias & P. Flachenecker & M. Freidel & N. König & V. Limmroth & E. Straube, 2006. "Costs and quality of life of multiple sclerosis in Germany," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 7(02), pages 34-44, July.
    3. Gisela Kobelt & Jenny Berg & Peter Lindgren & Bengt Jönsson, 2006. "Costs and quality of life in multiple sclerosis in Europe: method of assessment and analysis," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 7(02), pages 5-13, July.
    4. Gisela Kobelt & Jenny Berg & Peter Lindgren & Bengt Jönsson, 2006. "Costs and quality of life in multiple sclerosis in Europe: method of assessment and analysis," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 7(2), pages 5-13, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A. J. Hawton & C. Green, 2016. "Multiple sclerosis: relapses, resource use, and costs," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 17(7), pages 875-884, September.
    2. B. Svendsen & N. Grytten & L. Bø & H. Aarseth & T. Smedal & K-M. Myhr, 2018. "The economic impact of multiple sclerosis to the patients and their families in Norway," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(9), pages 1243-1257, December.
    3. Gisela Kobelt & Jenny Berg & Peter Lindgren & M. Battaglia & C. Lucioni & A. Uccelli, 2006. "Costs and quality of life of multiple sclerosis in Italy," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 7(2), pages 45-54, July.
    4. Uwe Zettl & Thomas Henze & Ute Essner & Peter Flachenecker, 2014. "Burden of disease in multiple sclerosis patients with spasticity in Germany: mobility improvement study (Move I)," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(9), pages 953-966, December.
    5. Kobelt, G., 2013. "Health Economics: An Introduction to Economic Evaluation," Monographs, Office of Health Economics, number 000004.
    6. Haucke, Florian & Brückner, Ulrike, 2010. "First approaches to the monetary impact of environmental health disturbances in Germany," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 34-44, January.
    7. Olivia Ernstsson & Hanna Gyllensten & Kristina Alexanderson & Petter Tinghög & Emilie Friberg & Anders Norlund, 2016. "Cost of Illness of Multiple Sclerosis - A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-25, July.
    8. B. Svendsen & K.-M. Myhr & H. Nyland & J. Aarseth, 2012. "The cost of multiple sclerosis in Norway," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 13(1), pages 81-91, February.
    9. Oliver Findling & Magdalena Baltisberger & Simon Jung & Christian P Kamm & Heinrich P Mattle & Johann Sellner, 2015. "Variables Related to Working Capability among Swiss Patients with Multiple Sclerosis—A Cohort Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-9, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0173353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.