IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0134554.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Age-Related Differences in Spatial Frequency Processing during Scene Categorization

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Ramanoël
  • Louise Kauffmann
  • Emilie Cousin
  • Michel Dojat
  • Carole Peyrin

Abstract

Visual analysis of real-life scenes starts with the parallel extraction of different visual elementary features at different spatial frequencies. The global shape of the scene is mainly contained in low spatial frequencies (LSF), and the edges and borders of objects are mainly contained in high spatial frequencies (HSF). The present fMRI study investigates the effect of age on the spatial frequency processing in scenes. Young and elderly participants performed a categorization task (indoor vs. outdoor) on LSF and HSF scenes. Behavioral results revealed performance degradation for elderly participants only when categorizing HSF scenes. At the cortical level, young participants exhibited retinotopic organization of spatial frequency processing, characterized by medial activation in the anterior part of the occipital lobe for LSF scenes (compared to HSF), and the lateral activation in the posterior part of the occipital lobe for HSF scenes (compared to LSF). Elderly participants showed activation only in the anterior part of the occipital lobe for LSF scenes (compared to HSF), but not significant activation for HSF (compared to LSF). Furthermore, a ROI analysis revealed that the parahippocampal place area, a scene-selective region, was less activated for HSF than LSF for elderly participants only. Comparison between groups revealed greater activation of the right inferior occipital gyrus in young participants than in elderly participants for HSF. Activation of temporo-parietal regions was greater in elderly participants irrespective of spatial frequencies. The present findings indicate a specific low-contrasted HSF deficit for normal elderly people, in association with an occipito-temporal cortex dysfunction, and a functional reorganization of the categorization of filtered scenes.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Ramanoël & Louise Kauffmann & Emilie Cousin & Michel Dojat & Carole Peyrin, 2015. "Age-Related Differences in Spatial Frequency Processing during Scene Categorization," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0134554
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0134554
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0134554&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0134554?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Russell Epstein & Nancy Kanwisher, 1998. "A cortical representation of the local visual environment," Nature, Nature, vol. 392(6676), pages 598-601, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marisa Nordt & Jesse Gomez & Vaidehi S. Natu & Alex A. Rezai & Dawn Finzi & Holly Kular & Kalanit Grill-Spector, 2023. "Longitudinal development of category representations in ventral temporal cortex predicts word and face recognition," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Ying Wang & Xue Zhang & Chunhui Wang & Weifen Huang & Qian Xu & Dong Liu & Wen Zhou & Shanguang Chen & Yi Jiang, 2022. "Modulation of biological motion perception in humans by gravity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Joel Z Leibo & Qianli Liao & Fabio Anselmi & Tomaso Poggio, 2015. "The Invariance Hypothesis Implies Domain-Specific Regions in Visual Cortex," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-29, October.
    4. Isabella C. Wagner & Luise P. Graichen & Boryana Todorova & Andre Lüttig & David B. Omer & Matthias Stangl & Claus Lamm, 2023. "Entorhinal grid-like codes and time-locked network dynamics track others navigating through space," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Marcelo G Mattar & Michael W Cole & Sharon L Thompson-Schill & Danielle S Bassett, 2015. "A Functional Cartography of Cognitive Systems," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-26, December.
    6. Guohua Shen & Tomoyasu Horikawa & Kei Majima & Yukiyasu Kamitani, 2019. "Deep image reconstruction from human brain activity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, January.
    7. Batrancea Larissa, 2021. "Research Insights From Cognitive Neuroscience For Everyday Economists," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 35-41, April.
    8. Zhou, Lixing & Takane, Yoshio & Hwang, Heungsun, 2016. "Dynamic GSCANO (Generalized Structured Canonical Correlation Analysis) with applications to the analysis of effective connectivity in functional neuroimaging data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 93-109.
    9. Mengna Yao & Bincheng Wen & Mingpo Yang & Jiebin Guo & Haozhou Jiang & Chao Feng & Yilei Cao & Huiguang He & Le Chang, 2023. "High-dimensional topographic organization of visual features in the primate temporal lobe," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, December.
    10. Michael F Bonner & Russell A Epstein, 2018. "Computational mechanisms underlying cortical responses to the affordance properties of visual scenes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-31, April.
    11. Krisztina Nagy & Mark W Greenlee & Gyula Kovács, 2011. "Sensory Competition in the Face Processing Areas of the Human Brain," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-12, September.
    12. Kai J Miller & Gerwin Schalk & Dora Hermes & Jeffrey G Ojemann & Rajesh P N Rao, 2016. "Spontaneous Decoding of the Timing and Content of Human Object Perception from Cortical Surface Recordings Reveals Complementary Information in the Event-Related Potential and Broadband Spectral Chang," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, January.
    13. Ping‐Shou Zhong & Jun Li & Piotr Kokoszka, 2021. "Multivariate analysis of variance and change points estimation for high‐dimensional longitudinal data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(2), pages 375-405, June.
    14. Haider Al-Tahan & Yalda Mohsenzadeh, 2021. "Reconstructing feedback representations in the ventral visual pathway with a generative adversarial autoencoder," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, March.
    15. István Czigler & Helene Intraub & Gábor Stefanics, 2013. "Prediction Beyond the Borders: ERP Indices of Boundary Extension-Related Error," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-1, September.
    16. Johannes Haushofer & Margaret S Livingstone & Nancy Kanwisher, 2008. "Multivariate Patterns in Object-Selective Cortex Dissociate Perceptual and Physical Shape Similarity," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-9, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0134554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.