IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0094465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multi-Site Evaluation of Innovative Approaches to Increase Tuberculosis Case Notification: Summary Results

Author

Listed:
  • Jacob Creswell
  • Suvanand Sahu
  • Lucie Blok
  • Mirjam I Bakker
  • Robert Stevens
  • Lucica Ditiu

Abstract

Background: Globally, TB notifications have stagnated since 2007, and sputum smear positive notifications have been declining despite policies to improve case detection. We evaluate results of 28 interventions focused on improving TB case detection. Methods: We measured additional sputum smear positive cases treated, defined as the intervention area's increase in case notification during the project compared to the previous year. Projects were encouraged to select control areas and collect historical notification data. We used time series negative binomial regression for over-dispersed cross-sectional data accounting for fixed and random effects to test the individual projects' effects on TB notification while controlling for trend and control populations. Results: Twenty-eight projects, 19 with control populations, completed at least four quarters of case finding activities, covering a population of 89.2 million. Among all projects sputum smear positive (SS+) TB notifications increased 24.9% and annualized notification rates increased from 69.1 to 86.2/100,000 (p = 0.0209) during interventions. Among the 19 projects with control populations, SS+TB case notifications increased 36.9% increase while in the control populations a 3.6% decrease was observed. Fourteen (74%) of the 19 projects' SS+TB notification rates in intervention areas increased from the baseline to intervention period when controlling for historical trends and notifications in control areas. Conclusions: Interventions were associated with large increases in TB notifications across many settings, using an array of interventions. Many people with TB are not reached using current approaches. Different methods and interventions tailored to local realities are urgently needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacob Creswell & Suvanand Sahu & Lucie Blok & Mirjam I Bakker & Robert Stevens & Lucica Ditiu, 2014. "A Multi-Site Evaluation of Innovative Approaches to Increase Tuberculosis Case Notification: Summary Results," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-11, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0094465
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094465
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094465&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0094465?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lucie Blok & Suvanand Sahu & Jacob Creswell & Sandra Alba & Robert Stevens & Mirjam I Bakker, 2015. "Comparative Meta-Analysis of Tuberculosis Contact Investigation Interventions in Eleven High Burden Countries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    2. A Sanaie & C Mergenthaler & A Nasrat & M K Seddiq & S D Mahmoodi & R H Stevens & J Creswell, 2016. "An Evaluation of Passive and Active Approaches to Improve Tuberculosis Notifications in Afghanistan," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-12, October.
    3. Onazi, Olajumoke & Adejumo, Adedeji Olusola & Redwood, Lisa & Okorie, Onuka & Lawal, Oyewole & Azuogu, Benedict & Gidado, Mustapha & Daniel, Olusoji James & Mitchell, Ellen M.H., 2020. "Community health care workers in pursuit of TB: Discourses and dilemmas," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0094465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.