IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0072945.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ashtrays and Signage as Determinants of a Smoke-Free Legislation’s Success

Author

Listed:
  • Constantine I Vardavas
  • Israel Agaku
  • Evridiki Patelarou
  • Nektarios Anagnostopoulos
  • Chrysanthi Nakou
  • Vassiliki Dramba
  • Gianna Giourgouli
  • Paraskevi Argyropoulou
  • Antonis Antoniadis
  • Konstantinos Gourgoulianis
  • Despoina Ourda
  • Lambros Lazuras
  • Monique Bertic
  • Christos Lionis
  • Gregory Connolly
  • Panagiotis Behrakis
  • on behalf of the Hellenic Air Monitoring Study Investigators

Abstract

Introduction: Successful smoke-free legislation is dependent on political will, enforcement and societal support. We report the success and pitfalls of a non-enforced nationwide smoke-free legislation in Greece, as well as ways in which compliance and enforcement-related factors, including ashtrays and signage, may impact indoor secondhand smoke (SHS) concentrations. Methods: A follow-up study of venues (n = 150, at baseline, n = 75 at 2-year follow-up) in Greece assessed indoor particulate matter with a diameter less than 2.5 micrometers (PM2.5) concentrations attributable to SHS smoke every six months for two years (n = 455 venue/measurements). Results: Following the implementation of the 2010 smoke-free legislation, mean PM2.5 concentrations attributable to SHS fell from 175.3 µg/m3 pre-ban to 84.52 µg/m3 immediately post-ban, increasing over subsequent waves (103.8 µg/m3 and 158.2 µg/m3 respectively). Controlling for potential influential factors such as ventilation, time of day, day of week, city and venue type, all post-ban measurements were still lower than during the pre-ban period (Wave 2 beta: −118.7, Wave 3 beta: −87.6, and Wave 4 beta: −69.9). Outdoor or indoor signage banning smoking was not found to affect SHS concentrations (beta: −10.9, p = 0.667 and beta: −18.1, p = 0.464 respectively). However, ashtray or ashtray equivalents were strong determinants of the existence of indoor SHS (beta: +67 µg/m3, p = 0.017). Conclusions: While the public may be supportive of smoke-free legislation, adherence may decline rapidly if enforcement is limited or nonexistent. Moreover, enforcement agencies should also focus on the comprehensive removal of ashtray equivalents that could act as cues for smoking within a venue.

Suggested Citation

  • Constantine I Vardavas & Israel Agaku & Evridiki Patelarou & Nektarios Anagnostopoulos & Chrysanthi Nakou & Vassiliki Dramba & Gianna Giourgouli & Paraskevi Argyropoulou & Antonis Antoniadis & Konstan, 2013. "Ashtrays and Signage as Determinants of a Smoke-Free Legislation’s Success," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-8, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0072945
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072945
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0072945
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0072945&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0072945?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bonfill, X. & Serra, C. & López, V., 1997. "Employee and public responses to simulated violations of no-smoking regulations in spain," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 87(6), pages 1035-1037.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karine Nyborg, 2020. "No Man is an Island: Social Coordination and the Environment," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(1), pages 177-193, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0072945. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.