IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0069265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lujiatun Psittacosaurids: Understanding Individual and Taphonomic Variation Using 3D Geometric Morphometrics

Author

Listed:
  • Brandon P Hedrick
  • Peter Dodson

Abstract

Psittacosaurus is one of the most abundant and speciose genera in the Dinosauria, with fifteen named species. The genus is geographically and temporally widespread with large sample sizes of several of the nominal species allowing detailed analysis of intra- and interspecific variation. We present a reanalysis of three separate, coeval species within the Psittacosauridae; P. lujiatunensis, P. major, and Hongshanosaurus houi from the Lujiatun beds of the Yixian Formation, northeastern China, using three-dimensional geometric morphometrics on a sample set of thirty skulls in combination with a reevaluation of the proposed character states for each species. Using these complementary methods, we show that individual and taphonomic variation are the joint causes of a large range of variation among the skulls when they are plotted in a morphospace. Our results demonstrate that there is only one species of Psittacosaurus within the Lujiatun beds and that the three nominal species represent different taphomorphotypes of P. lujiatunensis. The wide range of geometric morphometric variation in a single species of Psittacosaurus implies that the range of variation found in other dinosaurian groups may also be related to taphonomic distortion rather than interspecific variation. As the morphospace is driven primarily by variation resulting from taphonomic distortion, this study demonstrates that the geometric morphometric approach can only be used with great caution to delineate interspecific variation in Psittacosaurus and likely other dinosaur groups without a complementary evaluation of character states. This study presents the first application of 3D geometric morphometrics to the dinosaurian morphospace and the first attempt to quantify taphonomic variation in dinosaur skulls.

Suggested Citation

  • Brandon P Hedrick & Peter Dodson, 2013. "Lujiatun Psittacosaurids: Understanding Individual and Taphonomic Variation Using 3D Geometric Morphometrics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0069265
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0069265
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0069265&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0069265?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Victoria M Arbour & Philip J Currie, 2012. "Analyzing Taphonomic Deformation of Ankylosaur Skulls Using Retrodeformation and Finite Element Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-13, June.
    2. F. James Rohlf, 1999. "Shape Statistics: Procrustes Superimpositions and Tangent Spaces," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 16(2), pages 197-223, July.
    3. Nicolás E Campione & David C Evans, 2011. "Cranial Growth and Variation in Edmontosaurs (Dinosauria: Hadrosauridae): Implications for Latest Cretaceous Megaherbivore Diversity in North America," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-12, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giuseppe Marramà & Jürgen Kriwet, 2017. "Principal component and discriminant analyses as powerful tools to support taxonomic identification and their use for functional and phylogenetic signal detection of isolated fossil shark teeth," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katherine L Bell & Christopher A Hamm & Arthur M Shapiro & Chris C Nice, 2017. "Sympatric, temporally isolated populations of the pine white butterfly Neophasia menapia, are morphologically and genetically differentiated," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Irene Epifanio & María Victoria Ibáñez & Amelia Simó, 2018. "Archetypal shapes based on landmarks and extension to handle missing data," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 12(3), pages 705-735, September.
    3. Manuel Dehon & Denis Michez & André Nel & Michael S Engel & Thibaut De Meulemeester, 2014. "Wing Shape of Four New Bee Fossils (Hymenoptera: Anthophila) Provides Insights to Bee Evolution," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Sean T. Osis & Blayne A. Hettinga & Shari L. Macdonald & Reed Ferber, 2015. "A novel method to evaluate error in anatomical marker placement using a modified generalized Procrustes analysis," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(10), pages 1108-1116, July.
    5. Maria Carla de Francesco & Anna Loy, 2016. "Intra- and Interspecific Interactions as Proximate Determinants of Sexual Dimorphism and Allometric Trajectories in the Bottlenose Dolphin Tursiops truncatus (Cetacea, Odontoceti, Delphinidae)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Robert G Wallace, 2002. "The Shape of Space: Applying Geometric Morphometrics to Geographic Data," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(1), pages 119-144, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0069265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.