IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0055154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping of Single-Base Differences between Two DNA Strands in a Single Molecule Using Holliday Junction Nanomechanics

Author

Listed:
  • Camille Brème
  • François Heslot

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this work is to demonstrate a novel single-molecule DNA sequence comparison assay that is purely based on DNA mechanics. Methods: A molecular construct that contained the two homologous but non-identical DNA sequences that were to be compared was prepared such that a four-way (Holliday) junction could be formed by the formation of heteroduplexes through the inter-recombination of the strands. Magnetic tweezers were used to manipulate the force and the winding applied to this construct for inducing both the formation and the migration of a Holliday junction. The end-to-end distance of the construct was measured as a function of the winding and was used to monitor the behavior of the Holliday junction in different regions of the intra-molecular recombination. Main Results: In the appropriate buffer, the magnet rotation induces the migration of the Holliday junction in the regions where there is no sequence difference between the recombining sequences. In contrast, even a single-base difference between the recombining sequences leads to a long-lasting blockage of the migration in the same buffer; this effect was obtained when the junction was positioned near this locus (the site of the single-base difference) and forced toward the formation of heteroduplexes that comprise the locus. The migration blockages were detected through the identification of the formation of plectonemes. The detection of the presence of sequence differences and their respective mappings were obtained from the series of blockages that were detected. Significance: This work presents a novel single-molecule sequence comparison assay that is based on the use of a Holliday junction as an ultra-sensitive nanomechanism; the mismatches act as blocking grains of sand in the Holliday “DNA gearbox”. This approach will potentially have future applications in biotechnology.

Suggested Citation

  • Camille Brème & François Heslot, 2013. "Mapping of Single-Base Differences between Two DNA Strands in a Single Molecule Using Holliday Junction Nanomechanics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-9, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0055154
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0055154
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0055154&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0055154?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zev Bryant & Michael D. Stone & Jeff Gore & Steven B. Smith & Nicholas R. Cozzarelli & Carlos Bustamante, 2003. "Structural transitions and elasticity from torque measurements on DNA," Nature, Nature, vol. 424(6946), pages 338-341, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Korbinian Liebl & Martin Zacharias, 2020. "How global DNA unwinding causes non-uniform stress distribution and melting of DNA," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Pascal Carrivain & Maria Barbi & Jean-Marc Victor, 2014. "In Silico Single-Molecule Manipulation of DNA with Rigid Body Dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Jack W. Shepherd & Sebastien Guilbaud & Zhaokun Zhou & Jamieson A. L. Howard & Matthew Burman & Charley Schaefer & Adam Kerrigan & Clare Steele-King & Agnes Noy & Mark C. Leake, 2024. "Correlating fluorescence microscopy, optical and magnetic tweezers to study single chiral biopolymers such as DNA," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Oi Kwan Wong & Martin Guthold & Dorothy A Erie & Jeff Gelles, 2008. "Interconvertible Lac Repressor–DNA Loops Revealed by Single-Molecule Experiments," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-15, September.
    5. Fang-Chieh Chou & Jan Lipfert & Rhiju Das, 2014. "Blind Predictions of DNA and RNA Tweezers Experiments with Force and Torque," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0055154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.