IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0043101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Focusing on Attention: The Effects of Working Memory Capacity and Load on Selective Attention

Author

Listed:
  • Lubna Ahmed
  • Jan W de Fockert

Abstract

Background: Working memory (WM) is imperative for effective selective attention. Distractibility is greater under conditions of high (vs. low) concurrent working memory load (WML), and in individuals with low (vs. high) working memory capacity (WMC). In the current experiments, we recorded the flanker task performance of individuals with high and low WMC during low and high WML, to investigate the combined effect of WML and WMC on selective attention. Methodology/Principal Findings: In Experiment 1, distractibility from a distractor at a fixed distance from the target was greater when either WML was high or WMC was low, but surprisingly smaller when both WML was high and WMC low. Thus we observed an inverted-U relationship between reductions in WM resources and distractibility. In Experiment 2, we mapped the distribution of spatial attention as a function of WMC and WML, by recording distractibility across several target-to-distractor distances. The pattern of distractor effects across the target-to-distractor distances demonstrated that the distribution of the attentional window becomes dispersed as WM resources are limited. The attentional window was more spread out under high compared to low WML, and for low compared to high WMC individuals, and even more so when the two factors co-occurred (i.e., under high WML in low WMC individuals). The inverted-U pattern of distractibility effects in Experiment 1, replicated in Experiment 2, can thus be explained by differences in the spread of the attentional window as a function of WM resource availability. Conclusions/Significance: The current findings show that limitations in WM resources, due to either WML or individual differences in WMC, affect the spatial distribution of attention. The difference in attentional constraining between high and low WMC individuals demonstrated in the current experiments helps characterise the nature of previously established associations between WMC and controlled attention.

Suggested Citation

  • Lubna Ahmed & Jan W de Fockert, 2012. "Focusing on Attention: The Effects of Working Memory Capacity and Load on Selective Attention," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0043101
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0043101
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0043101&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0043101?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brent A Field & Cara L Buck & Samuel M McClure & Leigh E Nystrom & Daniel Kahneman & Jonathan D Cohen, 2015. "Attentional Modulation of Brain Responses to Primary Appetitive and Aversive Stimuli," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Luo, Yingyu & Zhou, Li & Huang, Jing & Wang, Xiaoxin & Sun, Rui & Zhu, Guowei, 2023. "Platform perspective verse user perspective: The role of expression perspective in privacy disclosure," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0043101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.