IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0009449.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mathematical modelling and phylodynamics for the study of dog rabies dynamics and control: A scoping review

Author

Listed:
  • Maylis Layan
  • Simon Dellicour
  • Guy Baele
  • Simon Cauchemez
  • Hervé Bourhy

Abstract

Background: Rabies is a fatal yet vaccine-preventable disease. In the last two decades, domestic dog populations have been shown to constitute the predominant reservoir of rabies in developing countries, causing 99% of human rabies cases. Despite substantial control efforts, dog rabies is still widely endemic and is spreading across previously rabies-free areas. Developing a detailed understanding of dog rabies dynamics and the impact of vaccination is essential to optimize existing control strategies and developing new ones. In this scoping review, we aimed at disentangling the respective contributions of mathematical models and phylodynamic approaches to advancing the understanding of rabies dynamics and control in domestic dog populations. We also addressed the methodological limitations of both approaches and the remaining issues related to studying rabies spread and how this could be applied to rabies control. Methodology/principal findings: We reviewed how mathematical modelling of disease dynamics and phylodynamics have been developed and used to characterize dog rabies dynamics and control. Through a detailed search of the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases, we identified a total of n = 59 relevant studies using mathematical models (n = 30), phylodynamic inference (n = 22) and interdisciplinary approaches (n = 7). We found that despite often relying on scarce rabies epidemiological data, mathematical models investigated multiple aspects of rabies dynamics and control. These models confirmed the overwhelming efficacy of massive dog vaccination campaigns in all settings and unraveled the role of dog population structure and frequent introductions in dog rabies maintenance. Phylodynamic approaches successfully disentangled the evolutionary and environmental determinants of rabies dispersal and consistently reported support for the role of reintroduction events and human-mediated transportation over long distances in the maintenance of rabies in endemic areas. Potential biases in data collection still need to be properly accounted for in most of these analyses. Finally, interdisciplinary studies were determined to provide the most comprehensive assessments through hypothesis generation and testing. They also represent new avenues, especially concerning the reconstruction of local transmission chains or clusters through data integration. Conclusions/significance: Despite advances in rabies knowledge, substantial uncertainty remains regarding the mechanisms of local spread, the role of wildlife in dog rabies maintenance, and the impact of community behavior on the efficacy of control strategies including vaccination of dogs. Future integrative approaches that use phylodynamic analyses and mechanistic models within a single framework could take full advantage of not only viral sequences but also additional epidemiological information as well as dog ecology data to refine our understanding of rabies spread and control. This would represent a significant improvement on past studies and a promising opportunity for canine rabies research in the frame of the One Health concept that aims to achieve better public health outcomes through cross-sector collaboration. Author summary: Rabies is a fatal yet vaccine-preventable zoonotic disease. Domestic dog populations are known to constitute the predominant reservoir of rabies in developing countries, causing 99% of human rabies cases. Despite valuable efforts to control rabies spread, the last two decades have seen only a limited reduction in the global rabies disease burden. Dog rabies is still endemic in Africa, Asia, and the Middle East, in part due to remaining knowledge gaps on dog rabies dynamics. We conducted an in-depth review of phylodynamic approaches and mathematical models used to study the spread and control of rabies in domestic dogs. We identified 59 relevant studies which used mathematical models (30), phylodynamic approaches (22), or interdisciplinary approaches (7). Our study revealed that these approaches disentangled different aspects of rabies spread and control. Mathematical models support the role of dog population heterogeneity as a key driver of rabies spread, and the overwhelming efficacy of dog vaccination campaigns to control rabies. Phylodynamic studies confirm the role of frequent reintroduction events and human-mediated transportation over long distances in rabies maintenance. Interdisciplinary studies represent a powerful tool to generate and test hypotheses on rabies spread. Finally, we identified new avenues which represent a promising opportunity for canine rabies research to achieve more impactful public health outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Maylis Layan & Simon Dellicour & Guy Baele & Simon Cauchemez & Hervé Bourhy, 2021. "Mathematical modelling and phylodynamics for the study of dog rabies dynamics and control: A scoping review," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0009449
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009449
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0009449
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0009449&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009449?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Degeling, Chris & Brookes, Victoria & Lea, Tess & Ward, Michael, 2018. "Rabies response, One Health and more-than-human considerations in Indigenous communities in northern Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 60-67.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gabriel Molina-Cuasapaz & Sofía de Janon & Marco Larrea-Álvarez & Esteban Fernández-Moreira & Karen Loaiza & Miroslava Šefcová & David Ayala-Velasteguí & Karla Mena & Christian Vinueza Burgos & David , 2022. "An Online Pattern Recognition-Oriented Workshop to Promote Interest among Undergraduate Students in How Mathematical Principles Could Be Applied within Veterinary Science," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-8, June.
    2. Giacomo Aletti & Alessandro Benfenati & Giovanni Naldi, 2021. "Graph, Spectra, Control and Epidemics: An Example with a SEIR Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(22), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Andrew Holtz & Guy Baele & Hervé Bourhy & Anna Zhukova, 2023. "Integrating full and partial genome sequences to decipher the global spread of canine rabies virus," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Krithika Srinivasan & Tim Kurz & Pradeep Kuttuva & Chris Pearson, 2019. "Reorienting rabies research and practice: Lessons from India," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Tamara Riley & Bonny Cumming & Joanne Thandrayen & Anna Meredith & Neil E. Anderson & Raymond Lovett, 2023. "One Health and Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Communities: A One Health Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(14), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Tamara Riley & Neil E. Anderson & Raymond Lovett & Anna Meredith & Bonny Cumming & Joanne Thandrayen, 2021. "One Health in Indigenous Communities: A Critical Review of the Evidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-12, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0009449. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.