IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1003393.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The risk of Plasmodium vivax parasitaemia after P. falciparum malaria: An individual patient data meta-analysis from the WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad S Hossain
  • Robert J Commons
  • Nicholas M Douglas
  • Kamala Thriemer
  • Bereket H Alemayehu
  • Chanaki Amaratunga
  • Anupkumar R Anvikar
  • Elizabeth A Ashley
  • Puji B S Asih
  • Verena I Carrara
  • Chanthap Lon
  • Umberto D’Alessandro
  • Timothy M E Davis
  • Arjen M Dondorp
  • Michael D Edstein
  • Rick M Fairhurst
  • Marcelo U Ferreira
  • Jimee Hwang
  • Bart Janssens
  • Harin Karunajeewa
  • Jean R Kiechel
  • Simone Ladeia-Andrade
  • Moses Laman
  • Mayfong Mayxay
  • Rose McGready
  • Brioni R Moore
  • Ivo Mueller
  • Paul N Newton
  • Nguyen T Thuy-Nhien
  • Harald Noedl
  • Francois Nosten
  • Aung P Phyo
  • Jeanne R Poespoprodjo
  • David L Saunders
  • Frank Smithuis
  • Michele D Spring
  • Kasia Stepniewska
  • Seila Suon
  • Yupin Suputtamongkol
  • Din Syafruddin
  • Hien T Tran
  • Neena Valecha
  • Michel Van Herp
  • Michele Van Vugt
  • Nicholas J White
  • Philippe J Guerin
  • Julie A Simpson
  • Ric N Price

Abstract

Background: There is a high risk of Plasmodium vivax parasitaemia following treatment of falciparum malaria. Our study aimed to quantify this risk and the associated determinants using an individual patient data meta-analysis in order to identify populations in which a policy of universal radical cure, combining artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) with a hypnozoitocidal antimalarial drug, would be beneficial. Methods and findings: A systematic review of Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews identified efficacy studies of uncomplicated falciparum malaria treated with ACT that were undertaken in regions coendemic for P. vivax between 1 January 1960 and 5 January 2018. Data from eligible studies were pooled using standardised methodology. The risk of P. vivax parasitaemia at days 42 and 63 and associated risk factors were investigated by multivariable Cox regression analyses. Study quality was assessed using a tool developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42018097400). In total, 42 studies enrolling 15,341 patients were included in the analysis, including 30 randomised controlled trials and 12 cohort studies. Overall, 14,146 (92.2%) patients had P. falciparum monoinfection and 1,195 (7.8%) mixed infection with P. falciparum and P. vivax. The median age was 17.0 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 9.0–29.0 years; range = 0–80 years), with 1,584 (10.3%) patients younger than 5 years. 2,711 (17.7%) patients were treated with artemether-lumefantrine (AL, 13 studies), 651 (4.2%) with artesunate-amodiaquine (AA, 6 studies), 7,340 (47.8%) with artesunate-mefloquine (AM, 25 studies), and 4,639 (30.2%) with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP, 16 studies). 14,537 patients (94.8%) were enrolled from the Asia-Pacific region, 684 (4.5%) from the Americas, and 120 (0.8%) from Africa. At day 42, the cumulative risk of vivax parasitaemia following treatment of P. falciparum was 31.1% (95% CI 28.9–33.4) after AL, 14.1% (95% CI 10.8–18.3) after AA, 7.4% (95% CI 6.7–8.1) after AM, and 4.5% (95% CI 3.9–5.3) after DP. By day 63, the risks had risen to 39.9% (95% CI 36.6–43.3), 42.4% (95% CI 34.7–51.2), 22.8% (95% CI 21.2–24.4), and 12.8% (95% CI 11.4–14.5), respectively. In multivariable analyses, the highest rate of P. vivax parasitaemia over 42 days of follow-up was in patients residing in areas of short relapse periodicity (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] = 6.2, 95% CI 2.0–19.5; p = 0.002); patients treated with AL (AHR = 6.2, 95% CI 4.6–8.5; p

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad S Hossain & Robert J Commons & Nicholas M Douglas & Kamala Thriemer & Bereket H Alemayehu & Chanaki Amaratunga & Anupkumar R Anvikar & Elizabeth A Ashley & Puji B S Asih & Verena I Carrara & , 2020. "The risk of Plasmodium vivax parasitaemia after P. falciparum malaria: An individual patient data meta-analysis from the WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(11), pages 1-26, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1003393
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003393
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1003393
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1003393&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003393?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael T. White & Patrick Walker & Stephan Karl & Manuel W. Hetzel & Tim Freeman & Andreea Waltmann & Moses Laman & Leanne J. Robinson & Azra Ghani & Ivo Mueller, 2018. "Mathematical modelling of the impact of expanding levels of malaria control interventions on Plasmodium vivax," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Shangge & Jian, Jinfeng & Poopal, Rama Krishnan & Chen, Xinyu & He, Yaqi & Xu, Hongbin & Yu, Huimin & Ren, Zongming, 2022. "Mathematical modeling in behavior responses: The tendency-prediction based on a persistence model on real-time data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 464(C).
    2. Ndii, Meksianis Z. & Adi, Yudi Ari, 2021. "Understanding the effects of individual awareness and vector controls on malaria transmission dynamics using multiple optimal control," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 153(P1).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1003393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.