IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1002714.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness and treatment moderators of internet interventions for adult problem drinking: An individual patient data meta-analysis of 19 randomised controlled trials

Author

Listed:
  • Heleen Riper
  • Adriaan Hoogendoorn
  • Pim Cuijpers
  • Eirini Karyotaki
  • Nikolaos Boumparis
  • Adriana Mira
  • Gerhard Andersson
  • Anne H Berman
  • Nicolas Bertholet
  • Gallus Bischof
  • Matthijs Blankers
  • Brigitte Boon
  • Leif Boß
  • Håvar Brendryen
  • John Cunningham
  • David Ebert
  • Anders Hansen
  • Reid Hester
  • Zarnie Khadjesari
  • Jeannet Kramer
  • Elizabeth Murray
  • Marloes Postel
  • Daniela Schulz
  • Kristina Sinadinovic
  • Brian Suffoletto
  • Christopher Sundström
  • Hein de Vries
  • Paul Wallace
  • Reinout W Wiers
  • Johannes H Smit

Abstract

Background: Face-to-face brief interventions for problem drinking are effective, but they have found limited implementation in routine care and the community. Internet-based interventions could overcome this treatment gap. We investigated effectiveness and moderators of treatment outcomes in internet-based interventions for adult problem drinking (iAIs). Methods and findings: Systematic searches were performed in medical and psychological databases to 31 December 2016. A one-stage individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA) was conducted with a linear mixed model complete-case approach, using baseline and first follow-up data. The primary outcome measure was mean weekly alcohol consumption in standard units (SUs, 10 grams of ethanol). Secondary outcome was treatment response (TR), defined as less than 14/21 SUs for women/men weekly. Putative participant, intervention, and study moderators were included. Robustness was verified in three sensitivity analyses: a two-stage IPDMA, a one-stage IPDMA using multiple imputation, and a missing-not-at-random (MNAR) analysis. We obtained baseline data for 14,198 adult participants (19 randomised controlled trials [RCTs], mean age 40.7 [SD = 13.2], 47.6% women). Their baseline mean weekly alcohol consumption was 38.1 SUs (SD = 26.9). Most were regular problem drinkers (80.1%, SUs 44.7, SD = 26.4) and 19.9% (SUs 11.9, SD = 4.1) were binge-only drinkers. About one third were heavy drinkers, meaning that women/men consumed, respectively, more than 35/50 SUs of alcohol at baseline (34.2%, SUs 65.9, SD = 27.1). Post-intervention data were available for 8,095 participants. Compared with controls, iAI participants showed a greater mean weekly decrease at follow-up of 5.02 SUs (95% CI −7.57 to −2.48, p

Suggested Citation

  • Heleen Riper & Adriaan Hoogendoorn & Pim Cuijpers & Eirini Karyotaki & Nikolaos Boumparis & Adriana Mira & Gerhard Andersson & Anne H Berman & Nicolas Bertholet & Gallus Bischof & Matthijs Blankers & , 2018. "Effectiveness and treatment moderators of internet interventions for adult problem drinking: An individual patient data meta-analysis of 19 randomised controlled trials," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-26, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1002714
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002714
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002714&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002714?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Natale Salvatore Bonfiglio & Maria Lidia Mascia & Maria Pietronilla Penna, 2022. "Digital Treatment Paths for Substance Use Disorders (SUDs)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-4, June.
    2. Gábor Kósa & Gergely Feher & Lilla Horvath & Ivan Zadori & Zsolt Nemeskeri & Miklos Kovacs & Éva Fejes & Janos Meszaros & Zoltan Banko & Antal Tibold, 2022. "Prevalence and Risk Factors of Problematic Internet Use among Hungarian Adult Recreational Esports Players," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-11, March.
    3. Nystrand, Camilla & Gebreslassie, Mihretab & Ssegonja, Richard & Feldman, Inna & Sampaio, Filipa, 2021. "A systematic review of economic evaluations of public health interventions targeting alcohol, tobacco, illicit drug use and problematic gambling: Using a case study to assess transferability," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 54-74.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1002714. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.